Michael Foley Obituary - Austin, TX (1973-2026) 39%

By Chicago Tribune6%

7/18/2026, 10:05:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 630 faulty-reasoning hits from 298 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,521 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the article peer group.

Michael J. 
Foley, of Austin, Texas, born into this world on October 1, 1973, passed away unexpectedly on May 11, 2026, following a brief illness. 
Michael is survived by his beloved daughters, Erin and Colleen Foley, ex-wife, Shannon (Swiderski), adoring mother and step-father, Cathy and Rick Rosen of Utica, Illinois, devoted father, Attorney Jack Foley of Chicago, and close siblings including brothers, Brendan (Ann) Foley of LaGrange, Illinois, James (Jama) Foley, and Matt Rosen and sisters, Jennifer (Nick) Dinham and Annie (Otto Junker) Foley, all of Chicago, as well as numerous nieces and nephews. 
Michael was a graduate of Southern Illinois University  Edwardsville and moved to Austin 25 years ago to join its burgeoning software industry. 
Over the years, he was responsible for several innovations in development and was highly regarded in his field. 
Michael was a joy to be around, kind and gentle, quick with a joke, and a lover of music, movies and television series. 
He was a prodigious reader and excelled in his knowledge of current affairs. 
Michael loved his family with profound intensity and they, in turn, are overwhelmed by his loss. 
His affable personality and exceptional insight were apparent to all he encountered. 
He was happiest of all with family and friends in whose hearts he will always reside. 
A private burial service for Michael’s immediate family led by Fr. 
Paul Carlson took place earlier this summer at St. 
Mary’s Cemetery in Utica, Illinois. 
Those wishing to pay their respects are invited to a Celebration of Life on Sunday, August 9, 2026, from 2:00-5:00 PM, at Mrs. 
Murphy’s Irish Bistro, 3905 N. 
Lincoln Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. 
In lieu of flowers, the family suggests memorial contributions to Michael’s daughters’ college fund or to a favorite charity. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 3.9%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Chicago Tribune: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 19.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.2%Loss Aversion19.5%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 7.7%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Pessimism Bias7.7%This article: 20.8%Chicago Tribune: 1.6%Chicago Tribune: 6.2%Negativity Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 23.2%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%In-Group Bias23.2%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 50.7%Chicago Tribune: 19.1%Chicago Tribune: 8.4%Halo Effect50.7%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.0%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 3.3%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.7%Chicago Tribune: 6.8%Chicago Tribune: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion10.7%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Chicago Tribune: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.4%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Chicago Tribune: 2.0%Anecdotal10.4%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.4%Chicago Tribune: 11.2%Chicago Tribune: 7.7%Biased Writer Voice15.4%This article: 23.2%Chicago Tribune: 1.1%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Indoctrination23.2%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.1%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.1%

298 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.0%attributed speech289writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 69 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coveragePaul Carlson • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paul Carlson

0%flagged-word coverage
9 attributed words100% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination-23.9 ptsWriter: 23.9%Paul Carlson: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Paul Carlson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.5 ptsWriter: 14.5%Paul Carlson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.