Lally Kelly Bridgid McNichols Obituary 26%

By Chicago Tribune6%

7/17/2026, 5:05:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 113 faulty-reasoning hits from 158 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,299 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the article peer group.

Lally Bridgid Kelly McNichols, 87, passed away after a life devoted to family, caregiving, and the city she loved. 
Born in Chicago, she spent most of her life in Chicago and Glenview before moving to Miami in 2022. 
She is survived by her four children, Frank (Kate Wester), Kelly (John Moore), Tony, and Maureen (Dave Estes); her sister, Judith; and her grandchildren, Lucy, Sean, Patrick, and Brigid. 
Lally earned her nursing degree from Triton JC and worked as an ER nurse from 1975 to 2014 at Weiss Memorial, Illinois Masonic, and the UIC System. 
Known for her humor, generosity, and devotion to family, she raised her children in Glenview, rescued many pets, restored historic Uptown homes, and traveled widely later in life. 
A memorial service will be held Saturday, July 25, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. at All Saints Cemetery in Des Plaines. 
Memorial donations may be made to Sacred Heart Schools in Chicago. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Chicago Tribune: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.6%Chicago Tribune: 6.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%Chicago Tribune: 19.1%Chicago Tribune: 8.4%Halo Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Appeal to Authority17.1%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 6.8%Chicago Tribune: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Chicago Tribune: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Chicago Tribune: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 29.7%Chicago Tribune: 11.2%Chicago Tribune: 7.7%Biased Writer Voice29.7%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.1%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.0%

158 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.