Emil Walter Iverson Obituary - Vernon Hills, IL ⁠7%

By Chicago Tribune⁠6%

7/18/2026, 5:05:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 89 faulty-reasoning hits from 181 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (20,494 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the article peer group.

Emil W. 
Iverson, 97, of Vernon Hills passed away on June 10, 2026. 
He was born in Minnesota and raised in Chicago. 
He was a proud Marine and running back at Northwestern University. 
He was a hard working man who loved playing with his kids, grandkids, and great grandkids. 
He loved cars and was a huge Cubs and Blackhawks fan. 
He loved John Wayne movies and would watch them over and over. 
He loved being outdoors. 
He was preceded in death by his wife of 66 years Muriel and his daughter-in-law Terese. 
He is survived by his sister Phyllis and her family and other family members from Muriel. 
He is survived by his children Emil (Ellen), Anne, John, Tom (Lisa), Steve (Rochelle), Jim (Brenda), and Mike. 
Loving grandfather of Tommy (Danielle), Matt (Cassy), Ryan (Missy), Danny (Jackie), Kevin (Erin), Dane, Cameron, and Kiana. 
Loving great grandfather to Avery, Selma, Wyatt, Briggs, Nova, Eleanora, Stevie, and Scottie. 
He will be missed by all of us. 
Burnett-Dane Funeral Home in Libertyville handled all the arrangements. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Chicago Tribune: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Chicago Tribune: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Chicago Tribune: 1.6%Chicago Tribune: 6.2%Negativity Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 31.5%Chicago Tribune: 19.1%Chicago Tribune: 8.4%Halo Effect31.5%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.8%Chicago Tribune: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.4%Chicago Tribune: 6.8%Chicago Tribune: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion4.4%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Chicago Tribune: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.4%Chicago Tribune: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Chicago Tribune: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.8%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Chicago Tribune: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.8%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.3%Chicago Tribune: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 11.2%Chicago Tribune: 7.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 1.1%Chicago Tribune: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chicago Tribune: 2.5%Chicago Tribune: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

181 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker5.0%attributed speech172writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBurnett-Dane Funeral Home • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
9 attributed words100% of attributed speech47% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.