Albert L. B. Pitts Jr. Obituary ⁠1%

By Hartford Courant⁠16%

8/6/2026, 9:05:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 106 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (29,082 of 29,133 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the article peer group.

Rev. 
Albert L. 
B. 
Pitts Jr., age 82, of Manchester, Connecticut, passed away peacefully on June 20, 2026. 
A Mobile, AL native and A Vietnam War Veteran. 
He resided in the New England area where he worked as a chaplain at the state prison and pastored in the A.M.E. 
Zion Church community. 
He is survived by his sons, Alec Pitts, Benjamin Pitts, and Triston Pitts, and his daughter, Chelsea Pitts. 
He was a beloved father, grandfather & great grandfather. 
He is preceded in death by Albert L. 
B. 
Pitts, Sr. (father), Eloise Griffin Pitts Chastang (mother), and Shana Pitts (daughter). 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Hartford Courant: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 1.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 2.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 2.5%Hartford Courant: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.9%Hartford Courant: 3.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 12.1%Hartford Courant: 5.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Hartford Courant: 0.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 1.0%Hartford Courant: 1.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 6.4%Hartford Courant: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 2.1%Hartford Courant: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.1%Hartford Courant: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 12.4%Hartford Courant: 5.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.5%Hartford Courant: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hartford Courant: 0.6%Hartford Courant: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

106 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.