Judge allows video statement from Tyler Robinson’s partner Lance Twiggs ‘with some redactions’  One America News Network 13%

7/8/2026, 6:30:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Primacy Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 405 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (17,987 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the article peer group.

(L) Tyler Robinson speaks with his defense attorney Kathryn Nester on Friday, April 17, 2026 in Provo, Utah. 
(Photo by Trent Nelson-Pool/Getty Images) (Background) Fourth District Court Judge Tony Graf on July 7, 2026 in Provo, Utah. 
(Photo by Trent Nelson  Pool/Getty Images) 
OAN Staff Lillian Mann 
6:30 PM  Wednesday, July 8, 2026 
During the multi-day preliminary hearing in Provo, Utah, state District Judge Tony Graf ruled that a recorded law enforcement interview with Lance Twiggs  the former roommate and romantic partner of Tyler Robinson  could be played in court “with some redactions.” 
The video allegedly contains second-hand remarks by Robinson, the accused killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, as well as text messages the 23-year-old reportedly sent to his former roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, 22. 
Robinson’s defense attorney, Richard Novak, fiercely objected to playing the video in an open court broadcast, arguing that prosecutors intend to frame the clips as “confessions,” which could heavily prejudice potential future jurors. 
Nonetheless, on the third day of Robinson’s five-day preliminary hearing, Graf denied the defense’s request to close the courtroom or block the video entirely. 
Instead, he ordered specific cuts and redactions to portions of the video near the end before it can be played and broadcasted. 
However, Judge Graf noted that he will watch and consider the full, unedited recording privately to help him determine if there is enough probable cause to send Robinson to a full trial. 
On Wednesday, State Bureau of Investigation Agent Brian Davis testified that Lance Twiggs, Robinson’s former roommate, had been interviewed twice during the investigation. 
Davis added that Twiggs was granted immunity for his statements, ensuring they cannot be used against him in any future criminal prosecution. 
Before Judge Graf’s ruling on Wednesday, Amanda Bakker  an FBI forensic DNA examiner and analyst  testified that matching DNA evidence was found on a towel wrapped around the purported murder weapon, which was recovered near Utah Valley University, where the assassination took place. 
Authorities have previously released text messages in which Robinson allegedly confessed to the horrific murder of Kirk on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
What do YOU think? 
Click here to jump to the comments! 
Sponsored Content Below 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.2%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon1.0%This article: 0.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.5%This article: 6.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.2%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice6.2%This article: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.2%

405 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageOAN Staff Lillian Mann • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRichard Novak • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Davis • 23 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Davis • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Bakker • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Amanda Bakker

0%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words35% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Amanda Bakker: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.0 ptsWriter: 9.0%Amanda Bakker: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%Amanda Bakker: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.