Today’s Wordle hints and answer: July 4, 2026, solution #1,841 ⁠10%

By Alan Martin⁠0%

10/8/2023, 12:17:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 431 faulty-reasoning hits from 290 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (19,814 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the article peer group.

Most people find uncovering today's Wordle answer to be rather tricky. 
According to the New York Times' WordleBot, the average player completes Wordle #1,841 in 4.1 moves in easy mode or 4.0 if playing by hard rules. 
Each day, we will update this article with Wordle hints and tips to help you find today's answer. 
And if the hints aren't enough, we'll even give you the answer, in case you're really stuck or just haven't had time to complete today's puzzle. 
Plus, we are also including an analysis of yesterday's puzzle, #1,840, in case you're reading this in a different time zone. 
So be warned: spoilers lie ahead for game #1,841, Only read on if you want to know today's Wordle answer! 
## Today's Wordle answer — hints to help you solve it 
Our first tip is that you should use one of the best Wordle start words for every game you play. 
But if you want some more specific clues to today's Wordle answer, then here you go: 
* It contains two of the five vowels. 
* 
* There is one repeated character. 
* That repeated character is one of the five least common Wordle letters. 
* By vowel, we mean A, E, I, O, U. 
There are other letters that are sometimes considered to be vowels, depending on how they are used. 
Those hints should get you at least some of the way towards finding today's Wordle answer. 
If not, then you can read on for bigger clues; or, if you just want to know the answer, then skip down further for that. 
Alright then, here's a larger hint: *You'll want a slice of today's Wordle answer. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Alan Martin: 9.4%Tomsguide: 2.9%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 4.5%Alan Martin: 4.8%Tomsguide: 1.5%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 8.6%Alan Martin: 4.3%Tomsguide: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.6%This article: 3.8%Alan Martin: 1.9%Tomsguide: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 3.8%Tomsguide: 3.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Alan Martin: 3.6%Tomsguide: 4.6%Framing Effect15.5%This article: 9.0%Alan Martin: 1.2%Tomsguide: 1.6%Loss Aversion9.0%This article: 7.2%Alan Martin: 3.6%Tomsguide: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Alan Martin: 9.9%Tomsguide: 4.9%Optimism Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 6.3%Tomsguide: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Alan Martin: 2.1%Tomsguide: 4.0%Negativity Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.7%Tomsguide: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 1.3%Tomsguide: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 4.7%Tomsguide: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.4%Tomsguide: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Alan Martin: 9.0%Tomsguide: 3.8%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 1.3%Tomsguide: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.5%Tomsguide: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Alan Martin: 5.2%Tomsguide: 5.2%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.7%Tomsguide: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 1.7%Tomsguide: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 3.1%Tomsguide: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 1.3%Tomsguide: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 2.6%Tomsguide: 1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 1.8%Tomsguide: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.2%Alan Martin: 1.5%Tomsguide: 2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.2%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.2%Tomsguide: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.3%Tomsguide: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 9.7%Tomsguide: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.5%Tomsguide: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.8%Alan Martin: 6.3%Tomsguide: 12.4%Biased Writer Voice13.8%This article: 21.7%Alan Martin: 2.9%Tomsguide: 4.2%Indoctrination21.7%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alan Martin: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Alan Martin: 1.3%Tomsguide: 14.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.0%

290 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker9.0%attributed speech264writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNew York Times • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

New York Times

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+94.7 ptsWriter: 5.3%New York Times: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-23.9 ptsWriter: 23.9%New York Times: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.8 ptsWriter: 9.8%New York Times: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.