Paddleboarder, 31, found dead in water at St. Pete’s Lassing Park 4%

By Chris Tisch0%

7/10/2026, 6:59:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 135 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,020 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the article peer group.

A 31-year-old woman who had been paddleboarding was found dead in the water at Lassing Park on Friday morning, the St. 
Petersburg Police Department reported. 
Police were called to the park, 2042 Beach Drive SE, at 10 a.m. after they received a call about “an unresponsive woman wearing a bathing suit found floating in the water close to shore,” a department news release states. 
St. 
Pete Fire Rescue arrived on scene, and the woman, who police identified as Erica Grace Wendling, was pronounced dead. 
Police found a paddleboard nearby and other items onshore, and they determined that Wendling had been paddleboarding. 
The news release states that Wendling’s death “does not appear suspicious” but the Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner’s Office will determine her cause of death. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.0%Chris Tisch: 4.2%Tampa Bay Times: 3.8%Framing Effect17.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 3.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 3.7%Tampa Bay Times: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 3.7%Tampa Bay Times: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 7.0%Tampa Bay Times: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.0%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.9%Chris Tisch: 8.7%Tampa Bay Times: 0.9%Unattributed Quote28.9%This article: 28.9%Chris Tisch: 3.2%Tampa Bay Times: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection28.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 1.9%Tampa Bay Times: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Tisch: 0.0%Tampa Bay Times: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

135 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech50writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSt. Petersburg Police Department • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSt. Petersburg Police Department • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coveragePete Fire Rescue • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner’s Office • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words27% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.