Question of the Week: “What steps do you take to conserve water?” 26%

7/23/2026, 1:30:00 AM

Keywords: Comment

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 237 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,301 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the article peer group.

BENNETT HARTGRAVE 
There are lots of small adjustments and optimizations one can make in their life. 
What ways can you limit product use to be water conscious? 
Sometimes we have a few steps in our routine. 
You can kind of make certain adjustments from one product, or combining a few different things into one, to reduce the number of steps and reduce the amount of water used. 
ALEX BAUM 
I drink from a reusable water bottle; I have an Owala. 
What else do you do to limit water use? 
I never leave the water on while I’m brushing my teeth, and I try to take shorter showers. 
TRICIA KIEHN 
Really basic things like turning off the water while I’m brushing my teeth and taking shorter showers. 
I think the greatest way is probably to keep an eye on watering your lawn. 
Have you adopted these habits? 
I’ve definitely tried. 
We actually don’t water our backyard at all right now. 
The only thing we water is the plants in our front yard and our tiny front lawn. 
TAYLOR MCMILLAN 
I’m a big fan of the great big, hot pink Stanley cup that I’ve got, so I just usually refill that two or three times a day. 
What inspired you to start using it? 
I started using it about two years ago. 
I found it for very cheap, and that was the main motivator, I guess. 
7/17/26, DOWNTOWN SPOKANE 
INTERVIEWS BY MIA STILLMAN AND LUCIA VALLE 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%inlander.com: 1.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%inlander.com: 1.7%Availability Heuristic12.1%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%inlander.com: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 2.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%inlander.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.5%This article: 5.5%inlander.com: 2.6%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 2.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%inlander.com: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 2.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.9%inlander.com: 2.9%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 37.1%inlander.com: 2.4%Anecdotal37.1%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 9.0%inlander.com: 2.4%Indoctrination9.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%inlander.com: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%inlander.com: 3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.5%

256 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.