Drone program expands to new Florida districts, aims to improve response times during school shootings 47%

By Litzy Grijalba51%

7/24/2026, 3:34:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 151 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.6% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,691 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the article peer group.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.  A company is creating high-tech help for Florida schools. 
Campus Guardian Angel in Jacksonville demonstrated its school-safety drone program. 
They plan to deploy their system at schools across multiple counties, including Broward, for the upcoming fall. 
Their drones are equipped with strobes, sirens, and pepper spray. 
They are remotely operated from Austin, Texas. 
“What most people don’t realize is school shootings typically last 120 seconds. 
So Parkland, Westside, and a lot of these shootings are over in 120 seconds, really before police have the opportunity to get there in mass. 
So just like the sprinkler system, we are there already. 
We can get after that person in seconds,” said a company official. 
The Florida legislature has authorized expanding the pilot program to three additional school districts to be selected at a later time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.6%Litzy Grijalba: 5.5%WSVN: 2.5%Confirmation Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 1.7%WSVN: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Litzy Grijalba: 7.2%WSVN: 3.6%Availability Heuristic16.6%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Litzy Grijalba: 12.0%WSVN: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 11.0%WSVN: 7.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 3.2%WSVN: 11.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 8.6%WSVN: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 1.3%WSVN: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.9%Litzy Grijalba: 3.6%WSVN: 3.6%Appeal to Authority7.9%This article: 16.6%Litzy Grijalba: 3.6%WSVN: 1.1%False Dilemma16.6%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.5%Litzy Grijalba: 18.1%WSVN: 2.4%Hasty Generalization24.5%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 8.6%WSVN: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.6%Litzy Grijalba: 3.6%WSVN: 2.6%Anecdotal16.6%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Litzy Grijalba: 1.7%WSVN: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 10.4%WSVN: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.9%Litzy Grijalba: 8.6%WSVN: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Litzy Grijalba: 0.0%WSVN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 39.1%Litzy Grijalba: 22.6%WSVN: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…39.1%

151 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech120writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCampus Guardian Angel • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageFlorida legislature • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Florida legislature

0%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words68% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -49.2 ptsWriter: 49.2%Florida legislature: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Florida legislature: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.