Florida 13-year-old arrested after photos of gun 56%

By Dave Urbanski32%

7/12/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 933 faulty-reasoning hits from 619 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,759 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the article peer group.

A Florida 13-year-old male was arrested after photos of a gun and a written death threat were sent over social media, authorities said Thursday. 
Deputies with the Flagler County Sheriff’s Office began investigating the incident on July 7 after the victim’s mother called 911 to report the threat to law enforcement, authorities said. 
‘I want to remind parents to stay engaged in what their kids are doing online and who they’re talking to.’ 
The victim, also 13, received several Instagram messages earlier in the day from the suspect that included a photo of the suspect holding a handgun as well as a written message that read, “Tn 8:00 pm we be there we alr got lo,” which translates to, “Tonight 8:00 pm we be there we already got location,” authorities said. 
The victim told deputies he believed the suspect planned to show up at his home and shoot him at 8 p.m. that night, authorities said. 
The suspect later told deputies that he and the victim used to be friends but had a falling-out, authorities said, adding that the suspect also stated that he had messaged the victim that day, and they were planning to fight. 
Deputies arrested the suspect and transported him to the Sheriff Perry Hall Inmate Detention Facility, where he was later transferred to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, authorities said. 
“Threats are no joke, and we take every threat seriously. 
This teen had already made plans to fight the victim, and he made it clear it wasn’t going to be a fistfight,” Sheriff Rick Staly said. 
“I want to remind parents to stay engaged in what their kids are doing online and who they’re talking to. 
Teach them the proper way of handling disagreements and be the sheriff of your home.” 
RELATED: Florida girl, 12, accused of threatening to 'shoot up' elementary school, threatening teacher 
Image source: Flagler County (Fla.) 
Sheriff’s Office 
Blaze News has reported extensively on similar arrests in Florida recently: 
In May, a 12-year-old girl was accused of threatening to "shoot up" an elementary school and threatening a teacher. 
An 11-year-old boy who was arrested in March for making a death threat was charged with the same crime in October, officials said. 
Also in March, the Volusia County Sheriff's Office arrested a 10-year-old boy and perp-walked him on camera after officials said he threatened to bring a gun to his elementary school and left a kill list in his classroom. 
In February, the Volusia County Sheriff's Office said officers arrested a 12-year-old girl after she posted online a "detailed manifesto" about carrying out a mass shooting at a middle school due to bullying. 
Also in February, a pair of 15-year-olds were arrested after being accused of threatening to shoot up high schools, police said. 
In late October, an 11-year-old girl was arrested after writing a "kill list" at her desk at school, police said. 
Then just two weeks later, an 11-year-old boy from the same school district was arrested after allegedly creating a "kill list" at school, police said. 
Also in October, a Florida sheriff's office came under fire for posting a 9-year-old male's mug shot on Facebook after his felony arrest for allegedly bringing a knife into his elementary school. 
Just a week prior, that same sheriff's office said a 10-year-old was arrested and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill, a third-degree felony, after bringing a pocketknife to school and threatening another student. 
The sheriff's office posted the suspect's name and mug shot. 
Like Blaze News? 
Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. 
Sign up here ! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Dave Urbanski: 4.9%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Dave Urbanski: 5.2%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.4%Dave Urbanski: 11.4%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.4%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.2%Dave Urbanski: 3.5%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority4.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Dave Urbanski: 1.2%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%Dave Urbanski: 4.2%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.4%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 42.2%Dave Urbanski: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal42.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.8%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.8%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Dave Urbanski: 4.1%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.8%Dave Urbanski: 6.2%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 8.9%Dave Urbanski: 2.4%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination8.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Dave Urbanski: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.9%

619 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech477writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 58 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSheriff Rick Staly • 10 words • 100.0% coverageSheriff Rick Staly • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSheriff Rick Staly • 20 words • 100.0% coverageSheriff Rick Staly • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageVolusia County Sheriff's Office • 38 words • 0.0% coverageVolusia County Sheriff's Office • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sheriff Rick Staly

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words50% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Indoctrination+45.1 ptsWriter: 4.2%Sheriff Rick Staly: 49.3%49.3%Unattributed Quote+10.5 ptsWriter: 3.6%Sheriff Rick Staly: 14.1%14.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Sheriff Rick Staly: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Sheriff Rick Staly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.