Gothamist76%

Federal investigators search ex-NYC Sheriff Anthony Miranda's home, device in Puerto Rico 35%

By Charles Lane36%

7/16/2026, 8:32:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 751 faulty-reasoning hits from 445 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.5% and a BS Rank of 35% (13,905 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the article peer group.

Federal investigators searched the home of former New York City Sheriff Anthony Miranda on Thursday morning as part of an ongoing federal investigation, according to city officials and a law enforcement official. 
Investigators also searched a personal electronic device belonging to Miranda while he was in Puerto Rico, a law enforcement official said. 
The official asked not to be named because they were not authorized to speak publicly about ongoing investigations. 
The searches are the clearest public sign yet that scrutiny of Miranda has moved from City Hall and Department of Investigation inquiries into a federal criminal investigation. 
Miranda, who was appointed under former Mayor Eric Adams, served as sheriff until Mayor Zohran Mamdani removed him from the post in May. 
He was replaced by Edwin Raymond. 
Before leaving office, Miranda had become the focus of multiple investigations tied to the city's crackdown on unlicensed cannabis shops. 
Those included a Department of Investigation inquiry into unvouchered cash discovered at the sheriff's Long Island City headquarters, a City Council investigation into cash seizures during cannabis enforcement raids and a reported pay-to-play investigation involving the National Latino Officers Association, which Miranda chaired. 
City Hall confirmed it was aware of the federal investigation. 
"Our administration is aware of the federal investigation into the former sheriff," Sam Raskin, a spokesperson for Mamdani, said in a statement. 
"This administration is committed to transparency and accountability. 
We will await any findings and conclusions as the legal process runs its course." 
The U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York declined to comment. 
A spokesperson for the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 
A spokesperson for the Department of Investigation declined to comment. 
Calls and messages seeking comment from Miranda were not immediately returned. 
The city investigations centered on "Operation Padlock to Protect," the Adams administration's campaign to shut down unlicensed cannabis stores. 
The city closed more than 750 shops during the crackdown. 
Miranda testified before the City Council in September 2024 that his deputies were not seizing cash during those enforcement operations. 
But attorneys representing cannabis businesses and sheriff's deputies disputed that account, saying deputies had taken cash from stores during raids. 
Later that month, Department of Investigation investigators searched the sheriff's headquarters after city officials reported finding approximately $100,000 in unvouchered cash inside office safes. 
At the time, City Hall said Miranda reported the cash to the Department of Finance, which referred the matter to DOI. 
Adams repeatedly defended Miranda during the earlier controversies, saying he had confidence in the sheriff despite the investigations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Charles Lane: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 6.1%Charles Lane: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 23.6%Charles Lane: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic23.6%This article: 9.9%Charles Lane: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.9%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Charles Lane: 5.7%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Charles Lane: 1.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 29.9%Charles Lane: 8.9%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias29.9%This article: 10.6%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Charles Lane: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem4.5%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.1%Charles Lane: 4.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority8.1%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 2.9%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.8%Charles Lane: 3.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion1.8%This article: 6.1%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question6.1%This article: 5.4%Charles Lane: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.1%Charles Lane: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.1%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.5%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.5%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Charles Lane: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.7%Charles Lane: 1.8%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Lane: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

445 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers41%attributed speech262writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageCity Hall • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSam Raskin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSam Raskin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSam Raskin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York • 14 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York • 22 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Investigation • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAnthony Miranda • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Investigation • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCity Hall • 21 words • 0.0% coverageEric Adams • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eric Adams

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words9.8% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Eric Adams: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Eric Adams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.