A 1953 postcard from a smooth-talking Bob leads to a Louisiana mystery 38%

By Jan Risher56%

7/19/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 825 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,564 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the article peer group.

Bob wrote only 26 words. 
Somehow, 73 years later, when I showed the postcard around the newsroom, five young women actually swooned. 
In full disclosure, I did too. 
On the back of a Times Square postcard, Bob wrote: 
“Dear Janie, 
Just came down from the Empire State Bldg, naturally my head is still up in the clouds  no wonder I thought of you. 
Bob” 
Despite punctuation issues, Bob’s message packs a punch. 
Bob had serious game. 
The postcard was postmarked 8:30 a.m. on April 24, 1953. 
I suspect Bob had visited the Empire State Building the day before. 
The weather was perfect  sunny, 75 degrees, with a low of 56. 
Bob may have been so smooth that the sun was always shining. 
I’m not exactly sure how or when I received the postcard. 
It’s small. 
It’s yellowed. 
It’s printed on linen-finished cotton paper. 
A similar one is for sale on eBay for $17.50. 
It was made by a Boston company called ColourPicture Publication, which made postcards from 1938 to 1969. 
Five summers of coordinating the Postcard Project have left me with boxes of postcards  new, handmade and decades old. 
I never know quite what to do with them, but every now and then, one turns out to be a treasure. 
The goal of the Postcard Project is to get postcards from all 50 states and as many countries as possible. 
Bob's postcard was addressed to Miss Mary Jane Gagnier at Marygrove College in Detroit. 
Its message was enough to send me down a rabbit hole. 
Who was the woman who could inspire a young man to be so poetic and thoughtful? 
I wanted to know her! 
Finding her didn’t take long. 
Mary Jane Gagnier Gelpi lived the last two decades of her life in Baton Rouge. 
She died on the first day of April this year. 
Her obituary confirmed that she attended Marygrove College in Detroit. 
Then, my search led me to Facebook, where I realized that three years ago, she had sent me a friend request. 
Maybe that was when she gathered her old postcards and sent them my way. 
She and I had other mutual friends. 
I started talking to people who knew her and learned that she was as delightful as I imagined. 
One distant relative described her as “pure sunshine.” 
Seemed appropriate. 
I was able to track down her son, Dr. 
Greg Gelpi in Baton Rouge. 
I knew, based on the details of her life I had learned, that she didn’t meet and marry his father for several years after Bob sent this postcard in 1953. 
Still, asking about a parent's old romance takes a certain sensitivity. 
Explaining the postcard to him turned out to be trickier than I expected. 
Bob had written it to Janie. 
When I read that version of the card to Dr. 
Gelpi, he didn’t register the connection. 
“Well, I don’t know either of those people,” he said at first. 
I then explained that it was addressed to his mom and, apparently, whoever Bob was had called her “Janie.” 
Oh. 
“Nobody really called her ‘Janie,’ but she might have been called that when she was at Marygrove or something,” he said. 
He explained that in his mother’s last days, she told him she had been engaged to someone else before she met his dad. 
Was it Bob? 
We’re not certain. 
I told Dr. 
Gelpi that everyone I spoke with who knew his mom said that she was an incredible human. 
In 1967, she was working on the cutting edge of computerization. 
At the age of 91, she earned her Life Master status in bridge. 
I regretted not knowing her. 
I said, “She must have read that I was looking for postcards.” 
That made sense, he said. 
 All the way up to her death, she was very hyper. 
She had 10 million things going on with the dietetic stuff and her food service career,” he said. 
“That would make sense that if she saw you were collecting cards.” 
I solved only half the mystery. 
Without more than "Bob," I didn't have enough to go on  no last name, no college. 
One postcard carried me into the life of a woman I never met and a man whose name I may never know. 
That's the magic of postcards  they can outlive moments they were meant to preserve. 
Sometimes they outlive the people who wrote or received them. 
*The 2026 Postcard Project has now received postcards from 43 states  down to missing seven states, four of which start with the letter N (Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire and North Dakota). 
The other missing states are Oklahoma, South Carolina and Vermont. 
*The 2026 Postcard Project ends on Labor Day. 
If you’d like to participate, send postcards to Jan Risher, The Advocate, 10705 Rieger Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70809. 
Email Jan Risher at jan.risher@theadvocate.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%Jan Risher: 7.1%nola.com: 2.4%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 1.5%Jan Risher: 0.5%nola.com: 1.1%Anchoring Bias1.5%This article: 11.0%Jan Risher: 4.5%nola.com: 2.6%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.5%Jan Risher: 0.2%nola.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.5%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.8%nola.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Jan Risher: 2.0%nola.com: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 6.4%Jan Risher: 3.1%nola.com: 4.4%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 2.7%Jan Risher: 0.9%nola.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion2.7%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Jan Risher: 0.8%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 6.5%Jan Risher: 2.2%nola.com: 3.9%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 1.6%Jan Risher: 0.5%nola.com: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 3.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Jan Risher: 0.2%nola.com: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.7%This article: 0.7%Jan Risher: 0.2%nola.com: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.7%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Jan Risher: 6.1%nola.com: 3.0%Halo Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Jan Risher: 1.3%nola.com: 1.1%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 1.2%Jan Risher: 0.4%nola.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.2%Jan Risher: 0.4%nola.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority1.2%This article: 0.4%Jan Risher: 0.1%nola.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.4%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.5%Jan Risher: 3.0%nola.com: 2.5%Hasty Generalization0.5%This article: 1.3%Jan Risher: 0.4%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring1.3%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.6%Jan Risher: 1.9%nola.com: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion5.6%This article: 1.9%Jan Risher: 0.6%nola.com: 0.4%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 6.1%Jan Risher: 3.1%nola.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.4%Jan Risher: 2.1%nola.com: 0.5%Burden of Proof6.4%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.2%Jan Risher: 0.4%nola.com: 0.2%Composition/Division1.2%This article: 13.7%Jan Risher: 6.5%nola.com: 2.5%Anecdotal13.7%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.5%Jan Risher: 2.8%nola.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.5%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%Jan Risher: 2.9%nola.com: 2.2%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 1.2%Jan Risher: 0.4%nola.com: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 12.2%Jan Risher: 6.7%nola.com: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice12.2%This article: 3.5%Jan Risher: 1.2%nola.com: 0.4%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jan Risher: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Jan Risher: 3.6%nola.com: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.1%

825 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers19%attributed speech670writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageBob • 2 words • 100.0% coverageBob • 24 words • 100.0% coverageBob • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 21 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 12 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Gelpi • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageThe Advocate • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJan Risher • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Advocate

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words12% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+98.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%The Advocate: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +97.3 ptsWriter: 2.7%The Advocate: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.1 ptsWriter: 15.1%The Advocate: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%The Advocate: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%The Advocate: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.