STLPR0%

Hoffmann, owner of Post-Dispatch, to buy KMOX and 5 other St. Louis radio stations 38%

By Rob Edwards0%

6/29/2026, 10:54:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 508 faulty-reasoning hits from 188 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,746 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the article peer group.

The owner of KMOX and several other St. 
Louis-area radio stations has agreed to sell its local portfolio to the Hoffmann Family of Companies. 
Under the terms of the agreement, Audacy would sell KMOX (1120 AM/104.1 FM) along with five additional St. 
Louis radio brands to Hoffmann. 
The other stations in the deal are: 
* 102.5 (KEZK-FM) 
* Y98 (KYKY-FM) 
* 96.3 R&B (WHUN-FM) 
* 97.1 FM Talk (KFTK-FM) 
* Hot 98.7 (WHHL-FM) 
“This is a deliberate step to accelerate the expansion of our media platform and establish it as one of the largest print and digital news organizations in the United States,” Hoffmann said in a statement. 
“With our planned acquisitions, combined with our existing portfolio of 154 newspapers and our expansion into radio, we expect to become the second-largest media company in the United States by year-end.” 
The Hoffmann Family of Companies has expanded aggressively in recent years beyond media acquisitions. 
Recently, the organization announced plans to purchase the NHL’s Pittsburgh Penguins. 
The radio acquisition remains subject to Federal Communications Commission approval. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Rob Edwards: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%Rob Edwards: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias16.5%This article: 5.9%Rob Edwards: 7.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 35.1%Rob Edwards: 3.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias35.1%This article: 5.3%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 7.4%Rob Edwards: 4.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 18.6%Rob Edwards: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect18.6%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Rob Edwards: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias13.3%This article: 5.9%Rob Edwards: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.6%Rob Edwards: 5.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority18.6%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.5%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization16.5%This article: 5.9%Rob Edwards: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring5.9%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 18.6%Rob Edwards: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question18.6%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 2.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.7%Rob Edwards: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.7%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 7.4%Rob Edwards: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity7.4%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.6%Rob Edwards: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote18.6%This article: 18.6%Rob Edwards: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection18.6%This article: 26.1%Rob Edwards: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice26.1%This article: 16.5%Rob Edwards: 3.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination16.5%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rob Edwards: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

188 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers74%attributed speech48writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Hoffmann • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHoffmann Family of Companies • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAudacy • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHoffmann • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHoffmann • 35 words • 100.0% coverageHoffmann • 31 words • 100.0% coverageHoffmann Family of Companies • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageFederal Communications Commission • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hoffmann

94%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words59% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+42.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hoffmann: 42.7%42.7%Quote-first Misdirection+42.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hoffmann: 42.7%42.7%Biased Writer Voice+42.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hoffmann: 42.7%42.7%Indoctrination+37.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hoffmann: 37.8%37.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.