Police: Mechanicville mother, grandmother plotted to kill 4 children 16%

By H.R. Schneider9%

8/4/2026, 7:35:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 952 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of 16% (23,878 of 28,359 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the article peer group.

Editor’s note: This story contains discussion of suicide. 
If you or someone you know needs help, contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988, or at 988lifeline.org/chat. 
MECHANICVILLE  Four children found dead at an apartment complex in June were murdered by their mother and grandmother as part of a conspiracy to keep them from their father, city police said at a news conference Tuesday morning. 
In what he described as a mass killing, police Chief William Rabbitt said 44-year-old Sarah Myers conspired with her mother, Amy Steadman, 64, to kill 13-year-old Harper, 11-year-old Hudson and 10-year-old twins Gavin and Gracelynn on June 10. 
Myers and Steadman then died by suicide. 
At a news conference Tuesday morning, Rabbitt said Steadman and Myers began their plan as early as June 5, when Steadman began visiting multiple pharmacies to purchase over-the-counter sleep aids and medication prescribed to her. 
Steadman’s internet search history included queries about medication reactions and the effects of insulin on non-diabetics. 
Messages between the mother and daughter revealed they wanted to dose the children between 10:30 a.m. and noon on June 10, before a scheduled 6 p.m. phone call with their father, Utah resident Brady Harmon. 
Police have previously said they found evidence of over-the-counter and prescription drugs and a handwritten note at the scene. 
On Tuesday, Rabbitt said that, in fact, investigators found multiple notes: one handwritten by Steadman and others unsigned. 
The letter from Steadman took responsibility for killing the children, claiming it was the only way to prevent abuse by their father. 
The series of unsigned handwritten papers  believed to be written by Myers  also alleged abuse had occurred while she and her children lived in Utah and expressed anger with the Utah Family Court system. 
Rabbitt said police were unable to independently verify these claims, and Harmon has denied them. 
Harmon previously told the Times Union that he had received 10 letters from Saratoga County Child Protective Services informing him of several investigations into inadequate guardianship and educational neglect, and that Myers had postponed his court-ordered time with them last summer until she said they had to return to school. 
Harmon, who said he had not seen his children in person since November 2019, had planned to pick them up on July 1. 
Instead, on July 2, the children’s cremated remains were flown to Utah, where Harmon and his family scattered their ashes on a mountaintop. 
Rabbitt said three of the children were poisoned, while 10-year-old Gavin was stabbed with a knife as he evidently tried to protect himself. 
The police chief said Steadman’s search history included “where’s the most fatal place to be stabbed?” 
and “find the carotid artery.” 
Rabbitt said that Steadman's letter acknowledged that the scheme hadn’t gone as planned: Messages between the grandmother and her daughter indicated the children were not responding to the medication as predicted. 
“It’s not working, we need another option,” one message said. 
At one point, 10-year-old Gracelynn messaged on her iPad about her stomach hurting. 
“Why would you do that?,” she wrote. 
“You won’t let me puke.” 
In a final disturbing message that evening, Steadman wrote that “Gracie is aware.” 
Rabbitt said the final message between Steadman and Myers was at 8:41 p.m. 
Steadman was last seen on surveillance footage around 9:30 p.m. going to a gas station before returning to her apartment. 
The investigation is still ongoing, and toxicology results have not yet been completed, Rabbitt said. 
“The deliberate murder of four children cannot be described as protection,” he said, later adding, “As a community, we cannot change what happened, but together we can honor these children by caring for one another, supporting those in need and doing everything within our power and to prevent another family from experiencing tragedy like this.” 
Speaking to the Times Union in a phone call after the news conference, Harmon said he had received a message on June 10 that the children had stomach aches and that they would call him the next day. 
His subsequent calls and messages went unanswered. 
He said the latest information from police did not surprise him, but it has left him reeling nonetheless. 
“All it tells me is that my kids were afraid, terrified,” he said. 
“You don’t do that to someone you love.” 
Harmon said he was disgusted by what he described as Myers’ hypocrisy and toxicity, and that she was “sick enough to believe her own lies.” 
In the six and a half years he said he fought to see his children, Harmon said Myers was under investigation by Child Protective Services. 
He had been unaware that they had been pulled out of school to be homeschooled. 
“You shouldn’t be able to pull your kids out of school,” he said. 
Harmon said he would like to know what medication his children were given, and who stabbed Gavin. 
“They stabbed my son; they poisoned my children,” he said. 
“All in the delusional state of, ‘We’re doing this for your benefit.’” 
Days after the killings, police responded to calls for wellness checks on June 13 and 17. 
Rabbitt said officers knocked on the door of the apartment they believed the children were at and spoke to a neighbor, unaware the family was already dead one building over. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%H.R. Schneider: 2.5%Times Union: 2.2%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 3.9%H.R. Schneider: 0.8%Times Union: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.9%This article: 2.4%H.R. Schneider: 0.8%Times Union: 1.8%Availability Heuristic2.4%This article: 2.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.7%Times Union: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 3.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.4%Times Union: 0.6%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 1.7%H.R. Schneider: 1.4%Times Union: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 1.0%H.R. Schneider: 1.5%Times Union: 2.5%Framing Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 1.1%Times Union: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 1.1%Times Union: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%H.R. Schneider: 4.2%Times Union: 5.8%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 7.7%H.R. Schneider: 1.2%Times Union: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias7.7%This article: 3.4%H.R. Schneider: 1.0%Times Union: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%H.R. Schneider: 1.1%Times Union: 0.9%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 2.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.2%Times Union: 0.1%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%H.R. Schneider: 1.0%Times Union: 0.5%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%H.R. Schneider: 1.4%Times Union: 1.7%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.6%Times Union: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.1%H.R. Schneider: 1.3%Times Union: 1.2%Hasty Generalization4.1%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.6%H.R. Schneider: 1.7%Times Union: 2.0%Appeal to Emotion8.6%This article: 2.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.3%Times Union: 0.4%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 3.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.7%Times Union: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 1.4%H.R. Schneider: 0.2%Times Union: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.4%This article: 5.4%H.R. Schneider: 0.6%Times Union: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.4%Times Union: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.2%Times Union: 0.8%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.6%H.R. Schneider: 0.8%Times Union: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.6%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.5%Times Union: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.2%Times Union: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.6%Times Union: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.5%H.R. Schneider: 0.3%Times Union: 0.4%Indoctrination2.5%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%H.R. Schneider: 0.0%Times Union: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

888 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers70%attributed speech268writer words
Selected voice

Steadman

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words2.1% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steadman: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Steadman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.