Operation Wreck the Joint: 'Drunk soldier steals 15-ton Bulldog tank before smashing up civilian cars in £100,000 joyride' 53%

By Andy Dolan70%

7/24/2026, 1:06:37 PM

Keywords: Dailymail

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 1,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (10,450 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the article peer group.

Two soldiers have been arrested after a ‘tank’ was allegedly stolen on an Army base and filmed on a £100,000 joyride, leaving crumpled civilian cars in its wake. 
Video footage shows the moment an allegedly drunk sapper steered the 15-ton Bulldog vehicle down a narrow access road after smashing into a parked van and SUV at around 1am this morning. 
Sources told The Sun the troops had been drinking off-base before returning to Tidworth Camp in Wiltshire and stealing the armoured personnel carrier (APC), which has a top speed of 32mph. 
In the footage  apparently filmed from an upstairs window  the allegedly tanked-up driver struggles to keep the Bulldog straight during the Fast and Furious-style rampage down the access road lined with soldiers’ personal cars. 
The camera then pans around to show a crumpled Vauxhall panel van which has been rammed into the silver SUV in front of it and partially on to the grass verge. 
The Sun said the SUV, bearing visible panel damage to its rear quarter and front wing, was thought to be a Chinese-made MG ZS electric vehicle  worth around £30,000  which soldiers have been warned not to hold sensitive conversations inside due to risk of spying. 
Following the destruction derby, pictures showed the APC parked neatly in between undamaged vehicles in a nearby parking area. 
Tidworth Camp is home to 26 Engineer Regiment, 1 Medical Regiment and the King’s Royal Hussars, amongst other regiments. 
The Bulldog needs a minimum crew of two and is powered by a 240hp Rolls-Royce engine. 
It is more than 9ft wide and 17ft long and designed to move troops over boggy battlefields. 
It is understood nobody was hurt and the Bulldog was undamaged in the incident. 
The soldier alleged to have piloted the vehicle was said to have been arrested by Royal Military Police officers in his room at dawn after comrades discovered the devastation on camp. 
A second soldier was also arrested. 
An Army spokesman said: ‘We expect the highest standards from our personnel. 
‘Two soldiers have been arrested by the Royal Military Police following an incident at Perham Down this morning, 24th July. 
We will not comment further while an investigation is ongoing.’ 
The Bulldog is capable of carrying up to ten passengers. 
The vehicle offers protection against small arms and artillery fire and is armed with a 7.62mm General Purpose Machine-gun. 
As well as being used for transporting infantry on the battlefield, Bulldogs have also been utilised as ambulances, command posts and recovery vehicles. 
Earlier this week construction began on a new £13million Regimental Headquarters for 1 Medical Regiment at Tidworth under the Ministry of Defence’s Defence Estate Optimisation investment programme. 
In 2024, a soldier based at Aliwal Barracks, Tidworth, was convicted of drink-driving after crashing into a telegraph pole in the town while dressed as Batman. 
Lewis Blondrage, 25, was caught by police after running from the scene in his superhero dress. 
He was found guilty of drink-driving and failing to stop at the scene of a road traffic collision and given a 12-month disqualification and £600 fine by magistrates in Swindon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.3%Andy Dolan: 8.7%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias20.3%This article: 5.8%Andy Dolan: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias5.8%This article: 16.0%Andy Dolan: 6.9%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic16.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Andy Dolan: 9.0%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.5%Andy Dolan: 1.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 5.0%Andy Dolan: 1.7%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect5.0%This article: 2.6%Andy Dolan: 0.9%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Andy Dolan: 13.9%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias17.3%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Andy Dolan: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error5.8%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 2.9%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Andy Dolan: 2.9%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect8.7%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%Andy Dolan: 2.9%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.0%Andy Dolan: 3.7%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority11.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Andy Dolan: 3.2%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 10.6%Andy Dolan: 6.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring10.6%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.0%Andy Dolan: 3.3%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.9%Andy Dolan: 2.0%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.9%Andy Dolan: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.9%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Andy Dolan: 5.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Andy Dolan: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.1%Andy Dolan: 17.0%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote28.1%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 1.1%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.2%Andy Dolan: 8.5%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice15.2%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andy Dolan: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

538 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker8.7%attributed speech491writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageThe Sun • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Sun

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words100% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+78.8 ptsWriter: 21.2%The Sun: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.7 ptsWriter: 16.7%The Sun: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.