Texas shooting leaves multiple people injured as police arrest suspect ⁠2%

By Jensen Bird⁠0%

5/23/2026, 5:26:34 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 317 faulty-reasoning hits from 247 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (21,595 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the article peer group.

An active shooter who has since been apprehended in Texas left multiple people injured. 
The suspect opened fire in the Kings Colony neighborhood, 25 miles from Houston, on Saturday around 5pm. 
Police confirmed multiple injuries and urged the public to avoid the rural area in New Caney. 
It is still unclear how many people were shot and the victims' conditions. 
'Law enforcement is currently responding to an active shooting in the Nottingham Rd area of the Kings Colony neighborhood in East County,' read a statement from the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office. 
'Multiple individuals have been shot. 
If you are outside the area, please avoid it and do not enter. 
If you are in the neighborhood, obey all commands from law enforcement, as they are on scene and actively working to bring the situation under control.' 
Around 7.30pm local time, the sheriff released a statement letting the public know that a suspect had been apprehended. 
Authorities have not disclosed the suspect's condition. 
The public is still encouraged to avoid the area. 
Multiple law enforcement agencies were seen leaving the scene, including the local police and fire departments. 
County officials announced a press conference in the coming hours to disclose more information on the incident. 
Reporters on the scene described the area as 'rural' with several large properties and residential roads. 
Montgomery County has an estimated population of 781,194 people. 
This is a developing story. 
Check back for updates. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.7%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Jensen Bird: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 6.5%Jensen Bird: 4.0%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 6.5%Jensen Bird: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.5%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Jensen Bird: 7.2%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%Jensen Bird: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Jensen Bird: 2.8%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 2.1%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Jensen Bird: 18.0%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 2.9%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.3%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Jensen Bird: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.0%Jensen Bird: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority17.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 3.6%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 10.2%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 10.5%Jensen Bird: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question10.5%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 2.5%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 4.2%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.6%Jensen Bird: 5.0%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote14.6%This article: 12.6%Jensen Bird: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection12.6%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 8.9%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 19.4%Jensen Bird: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination19.4%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jensen Bird: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Jensen Bird: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

247 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech211writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMontgomery County Sheriff's Office • 31 words • 100.0% coverageMontgomery County Sheriff's Office • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words100% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Montgomery County Sheriff's Office: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+86.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Montgomery County Sheriff's Office: 86.1%86.1%Indoctrination-22.7 ptsWriter: 22.7%Montgomery County Sheriff's Office: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Montgomery County Sheriff's Office: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.