Woke ad attacking LA mayoral hopeful Spencer Pratt backfires by making him sound MORE desirable to ordinary voters 89%

By Will Potter71%

5/11/2026, 12:49:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 2,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 757 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,410 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the article peer group.

A woke attack ad aimed at Los Angeles mayoral hopeful Spencer Pratt was mocked for serving as an unwitting endorsement for the former reality star. 
The ad released by the LA County Federation of Labor went viral on social media as it tried to criticized Pratt's supposed hardline stances on homelessness, policing and union power - even though many voters will find them sensible. 
'Republican Spencer Pratt is the last thing Los Angeles needs for mayor,' the advert says. 
'Pratt opposes using taxpayer money to build brand new houses for unhoused neighbors, saying it's time for the homeless to get help or get out.' 
Despite Los Angeles's issues with widespread crime and open-air drug taking, the ad also appeared to believe voters would be turned away by Pratt's vow to step up policing across the city. 
'Pratt thinks L.A. needs thousands more police officers rather than more social workers,' the ad said. 
It added: 'Republican Spencer Pratt thinks public employee unions should have less power, not more... 
LA is on the right track and needs to stay the course. 
Vote no on Republican Spencer Pratt.' 
The attack ad was ridiculed as many argued the messaging could help the ex-The Hills star's campaign, which has surged in recent days following a breakout debate against incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and hard-left rival Nithya Raman last week. 
Texas Senator Ted Cruz led the mockery of the ad, writing in an X post: 'This attack ad could well elect Pratt.' 
'I don't think I've ever seen an attack ad that comes across as an endorsement like this one,' another critic said on X. 
The Daily Mail has contacted Pratt's campaign and the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor for comment. 
It comes as Pratt's candidacy has gained traction with just weeks to go before June 2 election day. 
At a debate last week, Pratt saw his chances of winning the election skyrocket after multiple breakout moments. 
In one jibe that reportedly left Raman raging at a reporter following the debate, Pratt blasted her as a 'random city council member' and said she was a 'failure.' 
Pratt was widely seen as the victor in the debate, with 79 percent of viewers telling NBC that they believed he won the night over Bass and Raman. 
As part of his hardline platform against Los Angeles' social issues, Pratt recently unveiled plans to implement a three-week 'grace period' to warn criminals, drug users and homeless people to leave the city before he takes action. 
Speaking on the All In podcast to hammer home his message that the city of angels is 'worth saving,' he suggested that his mayoralty will begin with a brief reprieve for those committing crimes and the homeless. 
'My plan, the first three weeks, signs up across the city: no more nakedness, no more drug use, no more robbing, no worse, no more dog abuse,' he said. 
He says that his team will then go around and warn everyone that 'you got three more weeks of this, clock's ticking.' 
Pratt believes this will show those propagating crime in the city that 'there's a mayor in town' and even make some of the troublemakers leave. 
'After that, once we start enforcing the laws: boom! 
Streets will be back,' he promised. 
He also suggested that he would bring in the Centers for Disease Control to wade out the 'medieval diseases' living in LA's homeless encampments. 
Pratt launched his campaign after becoming a vocal critic of Bass's tenure as mayor, in particular after his $3.8 million home burned down in the LA wildfires in January last year. 
Although he registered as a Republican for the election, Pratt said his campaign is not centered on party affiliation, as he has also made fixing Los Angeles' issues with homelessness and drug use central to his candidacy. 
Recent polls show Pratt making gains before voters head to the polls on June 2, with the election heading to a runoff on November 3 if no candidate wins over 50 percent of the vote. 
Pratt, who is married to fellow reality star Heidi Montag, registered at 14 percent support in a UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies Poll last month, coming behind Bass at 25 percent and Raman at 17 percent. 
The debate on Wednesday appeared to only strengthen Pratt in the eyes of many, as pundits said the reality TV star came across as slick and no-nonsense compared to his competitors. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.9%Will Potter: 2.6%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Will Potter: 3.5%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 4.9%Will Potter: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 1.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 1.6%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Will Potter: 8.3%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect20.6%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.6%Will Potter: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.6%This article: 4.1%Will Potter: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect4.1%This article: 6.5%Will Potter: 2.4%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 2.9%Will Potter: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias2.9%This article: 18.6%Will Potter: 12.2%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias18.6%This article: 4.9%Will Potter: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 8.3%Will Potter: 1.7%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error8.3%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Will Potter: 8.4%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.6%Will Potter: 3.4%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias18.6%This article: 4.9%Will Potter: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Will Potter: 3.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem3.8%This article: 3.3%Will Potter: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man3.3%This article: 11.8%Will Potter: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority11.8%This article: 8.7%Will Potter: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma8.7%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Will Potter: 5.8%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.9%Will Potter: 1.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon5.9%This article: 13.1%Will Potter: 13.2%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion13.1%This article: 5.7%Will Potter: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question5.7%This article: 16.4%Will Potter: 3.5%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.4%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Will Potter: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.0%Will Potter: 4.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal16.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.2%Will Potter: 1.9%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.2%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.0%Will Potter: 2.4%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote23.0%This article: 13.6%Will Potter: 1.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection13.6%This article: 46.1%Will Potter: 11.9%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice46.1%This article: 2.4%Will Potter: 2.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 15.2%Will Potter: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias15.2%This article: 4.9%Will Potter: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Will Potter: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

757 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers30%attributed speech527writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageLA County Federation of Labor • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTed Cruz • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageThe Daily Mail • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 29 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Pratt • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words17% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+85.6 ptsWriter: 14.4%LA County Federation of Labor: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+45.7 ptsWriter: 54.3%LA County Federation of Labor: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-23.3 ptsWriter: 23.3%LA County Federation of Labor: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%LA County Federation of Labor: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%LA County Federation of Labor: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.