Gothamist77%

A fox crossed the Atlantic on a cargo ship. The Bronx Zoo is figuring out what's next. 

By Ryan Kost75%

5/22/2026, 10:58:00 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

A red fox that crossed the Atlantic Ocean as a stowaway on a cargo ship and was found at the Port of New York and New Jersey in February is healthy, out of quarantine and has been given a name: Basil. 
The Bronx Zoo took the 2-year-old English fox into its care earlier this year after he was secured by U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection at the end of his journey from Southampton, England. 
The zoo announced Friday that Basil, which rhymes with “dazzle,” was treated for a dangerous parasite known as “French heartworm” and has a clean bill of health. 
French heartworm infects the lungs’ blood vessels in wild canids and can cause severe respiratory disease if untreated, according to zoo officials. 
Basil took three different medications to help clear the parasite, and the zoo said his coat has grown fuller and shinier. 
He’s also gained some weight, and currently clocks in at 13.7 pounds. 
Foxes sometimes get a reputation for being skittish, but Basil is more sociable, said Keith Lovett, vice president and director of animal programs at the Bronx Zoo. 
“He must have been comfortable around the docks, around people,” Lovett said. 
 He's done really well here, and staff has really bonded well with him during the quarantine period.” 
At the moment, Basil is hanging out “behind the scenes” at the zoo, the vice president said. 
Staff are debating the best “forever” home for the fox. 
“We'll be making that decision over the next few weeks,” Lovett said. 
Zoo officials said this was an unusual case of a stowaway animal, though they regularly work with government agencies and others to help rescue illegally trafficked wildlife. 
“To have a fox stowaway on a ship, it's pretty rare,” Lovett said. 
“We deal with the illegal side of things, where people are illegally bringing animals into the country, and that's what we predominantly deal with. 
 But in this case, the fox took it upon himself to get on the ship.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.7%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Ryan Kost: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.7%This article: 7.7%Ryan Kost: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Ryan Kost: 7.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Ryan Kost: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 10.4%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Ryan Kost: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 30.7%Ryan Kost: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect30.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.2%Ryan Kost: 6.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority13.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.9%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning6.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.6%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 5.7%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Ryan Kost: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 3.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.2%Ryan Kost: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection5.2%This article: 7.7%Ryan Kost: 2.5%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.9%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kost: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

349 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers63%attributed speech130writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBronx Zoo • 27 words • 100.0% coverageBronx Zoo • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBronx Zoo • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBronx Zoo • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKeith Lovett • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Keith Lovett

77%flagged-word coverage
122 attributed words56% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection+14.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Keith Lovett: 14.8%14.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.