Wind-driven wildfire prompts evacuations in Spokane ⁠36%

By Associated Press⁠73%

8/1/2026, 9:55:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 291 faulty-reasoning hits from 244 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (17,338 of 26,695 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the article peer group.

SPOKANE, Wash. 
(AP) — A fast-moving wildfire driven by strong winds and high temperatures swept across northwest Spokane on Saturday before jumping the Spokane River and prompting the evacuation of thousands of people. 
The Old Trails Fire started around noon, burning brush and grass in an open area, but quickly spread north and east toward residential areas. 
Cars lined the roads as people fled their homes, and orange and red flames were visible from the highway. 
The blaze sent a plume of smoke billowing over the region, and as of the evening almost 4 square miles (10 square kilometers) of terrain had been burned, said Courtney James, spokesperson for the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 
The cause was under investigation. 
“We urge residents of Spokane to heed evacuation orders and to stay alert to changing conditions and evacuations as they are rapidly changing,” James said. 
Some structures were lost but officials did not yet have a solid count, said Jessica Watson, a DNR spokesperson for the fire. 
Firefighters had zero containment as of the evening and the wind continued to blow, she said. 
Power company Avista said it implemented public safety shutoffs in the area due to elevated fire risk. 
Gov. 
Bob Ferguson declared a state of emergency Saturday after unusually high temperatures and high winds exacerbated record wildfires across the state. 
The National Weather Service issued a “particularly dangerous situation” red flag alert for eastern Washington. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Associated Press: 2.0%The Columbian: 2.8%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%The Columbian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Associated Press: 2.6%The Columbian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic16.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%The Columbian: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Columbian: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%The Columbian: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Associated Press: 5.7%The Columbian: 6.5%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%The Columbian: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Columbian: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.9%The Columbian: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Associated Press: 1.5%The Columbian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias10.2%This article: 14.3%Associated Press: 7.5%The Columbian: 8.8%Negativity Bias14.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%The Columbian: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%The Columbian: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Columbian: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%The Columbian: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%The Columbian: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%The Columbian: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%The Columbian: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Columbian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%The Columbian: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 32.0%Associated Press: 2.6%The Columbian: 3.1%Appeal to Authority32.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%The Columbian: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Columbian: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%The Columbian: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Columbian: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%The Columbian: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.8%The Columbian: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Columbian: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.6%Associated Press: 2.0%The Columbian: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%The Columbian: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%The Columbian: 0.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%The Columbian: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Columbian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.6%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Columbian: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.7%Associated Press: 1.2%The Columbian: 2.4%Unattributed Quote12.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%The Columbian: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.4%The Columbian: 5.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 10.2%Associated Press: 0.6%The Columbian: 1.0%Indoctrination10.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%The Columbian: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Columbian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%The Columbian: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

244 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers64%attributed speech88writer words
Selected voice

Bob Ferguson

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words13% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote-35.2 ptsWriter: 35.2%Bob Ferguson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.