Christopher Dunn will stay free after Missouri appeals court upholds innocence ruling 2%

By Chad Davis0%

5/19/2026, 9:27:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 593 faulty-reasoning hits from 502 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,499 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the article peer group.

A Missouri appeals court ruled Tuesday that Christopher Dunn should remain a free man, upholding the ruling that overturned his decades-old murder conviction. 
The Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that a reasonable judge would find "clear and convincing evidence" that Dunn was innocent of the murder of Ricco Rogers. 
The decision comes exactly 36 years and one day after Ricco Rogers was killed. 
In a phone interview Tuesday, Christopher Dunn called the ruling overwhelming. 
"Ricco Rogers' family deserves justice," Dunn said. 
"I'm tired, but [I know] that the fight must continue until it's over." 
A spokesperson for the Missouri Attorney General's office said they are reviewing the ruling and considering next steps. 
Dunn was convicted of the murder of Ricco Rogers in 1990. 
He spent 34 years in prison and has maintained his innocence. 
The conviction was based on testimony from two boys who later recanted their statements and said prosecutors and police had coerced them into confessing. 
In 2020, Missouri Circuit Judge William Hickle ruled it was unlikely a jury would convict Dunn based on the evidence. 
A Missouri statute passed a year later allowed prosecutors to file petitions on behalf of convicted people they believe are innocent. 
In 2023, former St. 
Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner said she would file a motion to vacate Dunn's conviction but resigned months later. 
Current Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore filed a motion to throw out the conviction a year later. 
Dunn was released later that year after St. 
Louis Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser ruled Dunn was wrongly convicted. 
However, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled the attorney general's office could file an appeal. 
Oral arguments in the appeal began earlier this year. 
Tuesday, Dunn thanked his lawyers and legal team who have supported him over the years. 
He said even after his release, it's difficult to feel truly free. 
"My weight fluctuates, I go through my moments of anxiety, I have a stress level that goes beyond any comprehension," Dunn said. 
"I still feel like I'm in prison to a degree and not knowing if waking up would be a better option for me or if I should just remain in that bed and just exist, because right now I feel like I'm not able to live." 
Dunn's wife, Kira Dunn, echoed similar stressors, though she said they hope this is the end of their family's legal challenges. 
"I can only say that I am in awe of Chris and his resilience and his strength," Kira Dunn said. 
"I'm just trying the best I can to be by his side and be as much of a help and support as I can during this time. 
We support each other, and at least for me, a lot of this I'm trying really not to feel it until we know for sure that his freedom is secured, and we know for sure that this is over." 
Copyright 2026 St. 
Louis Public Radio 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Chad Davis: 8.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 10.4%Chad Davis: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion10.4%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Chad Davis: 4.5%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias4.2%This article: 13.7%Chad Davis: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias13.7%This article: 12.4%Chad Davis: 9.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias12.4%This article: 5.2%Chad Davis: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias6.0%This article: 4.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.8%Chad Davis: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority11.8%This article: 11.8%Chad Davis: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma11.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.2%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning4.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.5%Chad Davis: 9.3%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion23.5%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Chad Davis: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

502 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers58%attributed speech213writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 11 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMissouri Attorney General's office • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKim Gardner • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGabe Gore • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 15 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 22 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Dunn • 46 words • 0.0% coverageKira Dunn • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKira Dunn • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKira Dunn • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKira Dunn • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Public Radio • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Christopher Dunn

100%flagged-word coverage
126 attributed words44% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Christopher Dunn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.