KQED61%

Why Are Some East Bay Voters Receiving 2 Election Ballots? 9%

By Guy Marzorati71%

5/16/2026, 2:00:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Representativeness Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 131 hits. Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,235 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.3% and a BS Rank of 9% (19,431 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the article peer group.

Every registered voter in California should by now have received their ballot for the state’s June 2 primary election. 
But why are voters in the East Bay cities of Fremont, Hayward, Livermore and Pleasanton about to receive another ballot in their mailbox? 
It’s because the sudden resignation of former Rep. 
Eric Swalwell following sexual assault allegations created a vacancy in California’s 14th Congressional District, where these voters live. 
A special primary election to fill that seat will be held on June 16, just two weeks after California’s regularly scheduled primary. 
But as a result of California’s monthlong window of early voting, there will be two weeks of overlap between voting in the primary election and special election  meaning thousands of voters in this district might be juggling two different ballots during that time. 
Here’s a guide to help East Bay voters sort through the unexpected election wrinkle. 
Jump straight to: 
Who is running in the special election to replace Swalwell? 
If Swalwell was my representative, how can I cast my ballot? 
Why is there a special election for Congress in the 14th District? 
Swalwell decided last year to run for governor instead of seeking another term in Congress. 
A crowded field of candidates jumped into the primary to succeed him in representing the 14th District  with the top two finishers in the June 2 primary, regardless of party, advancing to the November general election. 
But on April 10, Swalwell was accused of sexual assault by a former staff member in reports published by the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN. 
Since then, more women have come forward with sexual assault and misconduct allegations, which Swalwell has denied. 
Eric Swalwell is interviewed on Political Breakdown by Marisa Lagos and Scott Shafer at KQED in San Francisco on April 6, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
On April 12, Swalwell suspended his campaign for governor. 
A day later, he announced he was resigning from Congress  a position he’d have otherwise continued to serve in for the rest of the year. 
Swalwell’s departure leaves a vacancy in a district that includes Castro Valley, Hayward, Livermore, Pleasanton and Union City, and parts of Dublin, Fremont, and San Leandro. 
On April 14, Gov. 
Gavin Newsom called a special election to fill the seat as soon as possible during the few months between Swalwell’s resignation and when his East Bay seat would change hands. 
Why isn’t this special election being held with the June primary? 
First off, combining the special election vote with the June 2 primary would not have been legal. 
But with an election already underway to succeed Swalwell, Newsom could have chosen to leave the seat open until January. 
Former Rep. 
Eric Swalwell addresses the press in Hayward on March 9, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
Instead, he called the special election within hours of Swalwell’s resignation and scheduled it for Aug. 18, the earliest date allowed under state law, which requires at least 126 days between the governor’s proclamation and an election. 
But this vote to replace Swalwell in the 14th District first needed a primary election. 
And since California election rules require a primary to be held nine Tuesdays before the special election, this has resulted in the June 16 primary special election date. 
With control of the House of Representatives separated by just a handful of votes, Newsom moved quickly to get a representative in the safely Democratic 14th District. 
For comparison, when Republican Rep. 
Doug LaMalfa died in January, Newsom waited 10 days before calling a special election. 
Who is running in the special election to replace Swalwell in his East Bay congressional district? 
Eleven candidates are on the special election ballot. 
State Sen. 
Aisha Wahab, former BART Director Melissa Hernandez and educator Rakhi Israni are the most notable Democrats in the race. 
Also on the ballot: Democrats Alisha Cordes, a business administrator, administrative law judge Sheriene Ridenour and businessman Jot Thiara. 
The Republicans running are real estate investor Wendy Huang, florist Dena Maldonado, businessman Tom Wong and educator Jack Wu. 
Victor Zevallos, a financial business strategist, is running as an independent. 
What about the ‘regular’ June 2 primary election that was already planned to fill Swalwell’s seat as of January? 
Hernandez, Huang, Israni, Maldonado and Wahab are also running in a field of nine candidates seeking a full term on the June 2 state primary ballot. 
Essentially, they want to not only fill Swalwell’s seat in January, but also to start earlier, thanks to the special election. 
Other candidates are only running in the regularly scheduled June 2 primary. 
You can learn more about the field, their supporters and where they stand on key issues in the KQED Primary Voter Guide. 
The June 2 primary will take place under new congressional district lines approved by California voters last year through Proposition 50, while the special election will take place under the current district lines. 
The differences are subtle: the current district includes all of Castro Valley, while the new district splits the city and takes in a greater number of voters from Dublin. 
So not all East Bay voters who receive a special election ballot  to decide who’ll fill Swalwell’s seat for several months in 2026  will get to vote on his long-term replacement. 
Swalwell was my representative. 
How can I cast my ballot in the special election? 
All voters in the 14th District under the current lines will receive a special election ballot in the mail beginning on May 18. 
Voters can return or cast their ballots at the same drop boxes and voting locations already open for the June 2 primary. 
On June 3, the day after the primary, 28 drop boxes will remain open around the 14th Congressional District for the area’s voters to use, according to Cynthia Cornejo, Alameda County’s interim registrar of voters. 
Additional vote centers for the special election will open their doors on June 6. 
Read more about tips for filling out your vote-by-mail ballot, including how to correct a mistake. 
When does the winner of the special election take office? 
If one candidate receives a majority of the votes in the June 16 election, they win the election outright and head to Washington to be sworn into Congress. 
A voter drops his ballot in a drop box inside of San Francisco City Hall on Nov. 4, 2025 in San Francisco, California. 
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Images) 
But if no candidate receives a majority, the top two finishers advance to a runoff on Aug. 
18. 
Ballots for that runoff would be mailed out to voters in mid-July. 
The winner of that race will be sworn in with just a couple of months to serve until the term ends in January. 
The June 16 special election will cost Alameda County approximately $6 million, Cornejo said. 
If the race heads to a runoff in August, the county would be on the hook for another $6 million in election costs. 
Is Swalwell still running for governor? 
Swalwell’s name is still on the June 2 primary ballot for governor, even though he has suspended his campaign and disappeared from public view. 
Swalwell’s exit from the governor’s race came after the deadline for candidates to remove their names from the ballot. 
As a result, the disgraced former Congress member remains one of the 61 names on the ballot for California’s top job. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Guy Marzorati: 1.9%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic2.5%This article: 5.2%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.2%This article: 3.7%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Guy Marzorati: 6.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 4.5%Guy Marzorati: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion4.5%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Guy Marzorati: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 1.9%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.9%This article: 10.6%Guy Marzorati: 5.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Guy Marzorati: 1.3%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 3.1%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Guy Marzorati: 2.6%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 1.1%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring1.1%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.6%Guy Marzorati: 3.5%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion3.6%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.7%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.4%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof1.4%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.6%Guy Marzorati: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.6%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote2.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.5%Guy Marzorati: 3.4%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.5%This article: 1.7%Guy Marzorati: 6.3%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination1.7%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Guy Marzorati: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Guy Marzorati: 2.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.2%

1235 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers1.6%attributed speech1,215writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKQED • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKQED • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCynthia Cornejo • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Cynthia Cornejo

0%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words70% of attributed speech50% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Cynthia Cornejo: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Cynthia Cornejo: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Cynthia Cornejo: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Cynthia Cornejo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.