KQED⁠61%

The Workers Who Make SFO Go 'Round Want Higher Wages ⁠91%

By Ericka Cruz Guevarra⁠0% Azul Dahlstrom-Eckman⁠29% Pauline Bartolone⁠0% Jessica Kariisa⁠0%

5/13/2026, 10:00:06 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,926 of 21,175 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

Workers at San Francisco International Airport who clean planes, handle baggage, and push wheelchairs told city supervisors at a recent hearing that they’re sleeping in their cars and surviving on rice and oatmeal. 
Now city supervisors say their labor fight for higher wages is on notice. 
Links: 
San Francisco Airport Labor Fight Hits City Hall This Week 
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco-Northern California Local. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.6%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 35.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.7%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic35.9%This article: 27.2%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic27.2%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 13.1%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect21.7%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.2%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.8%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 50.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 10.4%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias50.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 3.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.2%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 3.9%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 27.2%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring27.2%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 35.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion35.9%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.5%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 35.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal35.9%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 50.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.2%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote50.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 7.9%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice10.9%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.0%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

92 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.