KQED61%

What To Know About The Changes at SFO That Could Delay Your Flight 0%

By Nisa Khan26%

4/3/2026, 5:00:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,035 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Many Bay Area travelers have been relieved that because San Francisco International Airport uses a private contractor for its security screening rather than the Transportation Security Administration, it has been largely unaffected by the partial government shutdown, which has caused hours-long security lines in other airports around the country. 
But new guidance from the Federal Aviation Administration that went into effect on Monday is now restricting how planes land on SFO’s runways and is already causing delays for a quarter of arriving flights. 
SFO uniquely has two main landing runways, about 750 feet apart. 
On a clear day, planes can land side-by-side, allowing around 60 arrivals per hour. 
On foggy days, SFO avoids these dual arrivals for safety reasons and reduces arrivals to 30 per hour. 
Now, the FAA told KQED that the agency’s “safety measure prohibits flights from making side-by-side approaches to SFO’s parallel east-west runways in clear weather when the pilots acknowledge having the other aircraft in sight.” 
The International Terminal at San Francisco International Airport on Dec. 
10, 2025. 
A new rule from the Federal Aviation Administration is restricting how planes land on SFO’s runways, causing flight delays. 
What to know if you’re traveling soon. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
And as of Monday, the FAA’s new rule for SFO landings “requires staggered approaches, with one aircraft offset from the aircraft on the parallel runway,” the statement reads. 
This change has already led to flight delays “averaging around 30 minutes,” SFO spokesperson Doug Yakel said. 
So if you have an upcoming flight in or out of SFO, or are planning to travel soon, what should you know? 
Read more on these restrictions and how they could impact your flights in and out of the Bay’s biggest airport. 
What are the changes to SFO’s runways, and why will this cause flight delays? 
Firstly, you should know: Delays caused by this new FAA runway restriction are coming on the heels of unrelated construction work at SFO that’s also causing delays. 
On March 30, unrelated to the recent FAA restriction, SFO closed Runway 1 Right for construction that is predicted to last six months. 
Yakel said the airport is currently forecasting that 15% of flights will be delayed over the next half a year due to this project. 
Passengers wait for their flight at San Francisco International Airport on Dec. 
10, 2025. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
But now, on top of that, the FAA restriction will also “increase the delay potential to approximately 25% of arriving flights experiencing a delay of at least 30 minutes,” Yakel said. 
“We are working with the FAA on ways to improve the arrival rate at SFO,” Yakel said to KQED. 
“We remain in contact with both the FAA and airlines on this issue.” 
The FAA confirmed to KQED that it is “exploring ways to safely increase the airport arrival rate.” 
All of which is to say: Between construction and the new FAA restriction, there’s a higher chance passengers will face flight delays at SFO. 
Does this just affect incoming flights at SFO? 
The restriction  and the 25%-of-flights-affected figure  apply to arriving flights, Yakel said. 
“But if that arriving aircraft is turning around to represent a departing flight, that could also experience a delay,” he said. 
A Delta Airlines plane at San Francisco International Airport on Dec. 
10, 2025. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
That means that even if your flight leaves from SFO, you could still be left waiting  because the plane your flight is using has been delayed arriving. 
Will this impact existing bookings for flights arriving at SFO? 
This depends on the airlines, Yakel said. 
“We know they are looking into this,” he said. 
“Airlines would communicate such changes directly to affected customers.” 
A spokesperson with United Airlines  which has its hub at SFO  said that they are “reviewing the FAA’s updated guidance to determine if we will need to make any changes to our flight schedule in the future.” 
A person walks to their destination at San Francisco International Airport on Dec. 
10, 2025. 
(Beth LaBerge/KQED) 
“We encourage customers to check their flight status in the United app,” the spokesperson said. 
KQED photographer Beth LaBerge, who previously worked for years as a customer service agent for Delta Airlines, said in a previous guide exploring hacks for navigating SFO smoothly that the airport is already known for what’s called “flow control delay,” especially during morning flights when the marine layer comes in. 
“Being proactive is one of the biggest things that I recommend to anyone flying from anywhere,” LaBerge said. 
She recommended that you download your airline’s app and turn on alerts, which “will give you updates about delays, gate changes [and] cancellations, and just help you stay ahead of those surprises.” 
As a backup, travelers can also check on the status of their flight on the SFO website. 
How long will this restriction be in place? 
Yakel said that the “FAA has yet to communicate a timeframe for this.” 
SFO’s unrelated runway construction project, however, is scheduled to end on Oct. 
2. 
However, Yakel said, if the FAA’s restrictions remain in place, then we would still see 25% of flights delayed.” 
Will this cause the same security delays that travelers are seeing around the country? 
Yakel said the new FAA rule will not impact security lines at SFO. 
Since Feb. 
14, TSA staff have worked without pay due to the ongoing partial government shutdown  and with many calling out of work, passengers across the United States have experienced hours-long security screening lines. 
CE agents stand next to the security line at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport on March 23, 2026, in Atlanta, Georgia. 
The travel disruptions continue as hundreds of TSA agents quit or work without pay during a partial government shutdown. 
(Megan Varner/Getty Images) 
SFO has been spared long wait lines by the fact that its security screening is contracted by a private company rather than the TSA. 
The national situation was somewhat alleviated by a late March executive order by President Donald Trump that allowed TSA agents around the country to get paid. 
It is unclear how long agents will be paid this way. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.4%Nisa Khan: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias1.4%This article: 3.2%Nisa Khan: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 14.1%Nisa Khan: 3.4%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic14.1%This article: 1.1%Nisa Khan: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.1%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Nisa Khan: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.2%This article: 8.6%Nisa Khan: 3.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 6.3%Nisa Khan: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion6.3%This article: 3.8%Nisa Khan: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 2.6%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.6%This article: 8.2%Nisa Khan: 3.2%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias8.2%This article: 8.4%Nisa Khan: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias8.4%This article: 12.2%Nisa Khan: 4.1%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias12.2%This article: 1.3%Nisa Khan: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Nisa Khan: 1.7%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Nisa Khan: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.8%Nisa Khan: 3.0%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority10.8%This article: 2.2%Nisa Khan: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Nisa Khan: 4.4%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%Nisa Khan: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 5.0%Nisa Khan: 2.5%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 1.4%Nisa Khan: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 18.1%Nisa Khan: 2.0%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.1%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.7%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.7%This article: 2.3%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division2.3%This article: 4.8%Nisa Khan: 2.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.0%Nisa Khan: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Nisa Khan: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote1.6%This article: 3.3%Nisa Khan: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 15.4%Nisa Khan: 2.3%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice15.4%This article: 7.6%Nisa Khan: 3.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination7.6%This article: 0.0%Nisa Khan: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Nisa Khan: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.5%This article: 11.3%Nisa Khan: 2.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.3%

1035 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers37%attributed speech647writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFederal Aviation Administration • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 9 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Airlines • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 2 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Airlines • 15 words • 100.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 50 words • 100.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 18 words • 100.0% coverageBeth LaBerge • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Yakel • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Beth LaBerge

93%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words28% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +72.8 ptsWriter: 3.1%Beth LaBerge: 75.9%75.9%Indoctrination+41.8 ptsWriter: 4.5%Beth LaBerge: 46.3%46.3%Biased Writer Voice+29.4 ptsWriter: 16.8%Beth LaBerge: 46.3%46.3%Quote-first Misdirection-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Beth LaBerge: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Beth LaBerge: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.