Microsoft is making Windows 11's search box 4 whole pixels taller for some reason 49%

By Zac Bowden58%

7/9/2026, 11:49:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 948 faulty-reasoning hits from 464 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,318 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the article peer group.

It looks like Microsoft is planning to make a small but interesting (ok, maybe not that interesting) change to Windows 11 in the coming weeks, one that has us scratching our heads a bit. 
The company has revealed (albeit accidentally) that it's making the search box that appears on the Taskbar and in the Start menu a little taller, by 4 whole pixels. 
4 pixels doesn't sound like much of a change, but it is a noticeable difference, if you can believe it. 
The change makes the search box appear chunkier, taking up more visible space above and below it, and bringing it closer to the top edge of the Taskbar itself and slightly pushing content down in Start. 
Here's a before and after of the Start menu and Taskbar, in gif format so that it loops making the difference very easy to identify: 
Notice how things shift slightly when the thicker search box is enabled. 
(Image credit: Zac Bowden / Windows Central) Microsoft hasn't explained why it's making this change, but if I had to guess, I'd say the change is being made to align it with the Ask Copilot search box appearance, which differs from the existing Windows Search search box. 
Ask Copilot is an alternative search experience coming soon to the Taskbar on Windows 11 that incorporates Copilot chat directly into the user interface. 
It's currently aimed at commercial customers, and includes a thicker but narrower search box that appears on the Taskbar when enabled. 
Ask Copilot is a separate UI to the standard Windows Search experience, and needs to be manually enabled before you can use it. 
That's why I think Microsoft is making the default search box 4 pixels taller, as the company likes the look of Ask Copilot and would like that appearance to apply to the default search box too. 
Here's a closer look at the search box on the Taskbar comparing the new height to the old height. 
See, it is a noticeable difference! 
Investigative journalism at its finest on display here. 
Top: The new taller search box. 
Bottom: The current search box. 
(Image credit: Zac Bowden / Windows Central) Either way, you can likely expect to see the search box in the Start menu and on the Taskbar get slightly bigger in the coming months, as Microsoft begins rolling out the change to Insiders before making it generally available to all. 
The change was unveiled in a changelog for a recent Windows 11 preview build, but a Microsoft engineer has since confirmed to me that the change isn't yet being previewed. 
Thanks phantomofearth! 
Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.6%Zac Bowden: 6.0%Windows Central: 4.2%Confirmation Bias11.6%This article: 10.1%Zac Bowden: 0.3%Windows Central: 1.0%Anchoring Bias10.1%This article: 13.8%Zac Bowden: 4.3%Windows Central: 4.6%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.7%Windows Central: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 17.9%Zac Bowden: 3.7%Windows Central: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias17.9%This article: 7.3%Zac Bowden: 6.4%Windows Central: 5.0%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.5%Windows Central: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.2%Windows Central: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.3%Windows Central: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Zac Bowden: 14.7%Windows Central: 8.0%Optimism Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.5%Windows Central: 3.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Zac Bowden: 5.8%Windows Central: 8.6%Negativity Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.8%Windows Central: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.2%Windows Central: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.7%Windows Central: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Zac Bowden: 3.9%Windows Central: 4.1%Halo Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Zac Bowden: 3.0%Windows Central: 2.2%Recency Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Zac Bowden: 0.2%Windows Central: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.4%Zac Bowden: 3.3%Windows Central: 3.7%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.6%Windows Central: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.1%Windows Central: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.6%Zac Bowden: 10.2%Windows Central: 8.5%Hasty Generalization10.6%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.9%Windows Central: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%Zac Bowden: 2.0%Windows Central: 3.8%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 7.8%Zac Bowden: 1.1%Windows Central: 0.9%Begging the Question7.8%This article: 17.9%Zac Bowden: 5.3%Windows Central: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.9%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.4%Windows Central: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.5%Windows Central: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.3%Zac Bowden: 7.1%Windows Central: 4.0%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Zac Bowden: 3.9%Windows Central: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.7%Zac Bowden: 2.9%Windows Central: 3.0%Unattributed Quote12.7%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.3%Windows Central: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 30.8%Zac Bowden: 12.4%Windows Central: 13.9%Biased Writer Voice30.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 1.1%Windows Central: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Bowden: 0.0%Windows Central: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Zac Bowden: 5.1%Windows Central: 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.9%

464 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.