The Cover Stories That Put Mother Jones on the Map 28%

By Ian Gordon0%

6/25/2026, 4:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 1,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,854 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the article peer group.

For our 50th anniversary issue, we did something that we try every once in a while: We produced two covers, one for subscribers and one for the newsstand. 
The idea behind a split cover is to give different types of readers different experiences. 
In this case, subscribers got a rich, celebratory collage from artist Max-o-matic, stitching together some of the most iconic and aberrant figures of our half-century in print. 
For the newsstand, our art team took inspiration from Nirvana’s legendary second album to tease Casey Michel’s investigation of Jared Kushner’s (self-)dealings. 
With the help of ace illustrator Justin Metz, we had an insta-classic: Nevermind the Corruption. 
Both covers blend stunning visuals and sharp design with the bold (and occasionally irreverent) writing inside the magazine—something we’ve been shooting for ever since our first issue way back in 1976. 
March 1976 
For our premier issue, illustrator Dugald Stermer recasts The Spirit of ’76 with a movement vibe. 
October 1977 
Art director Louise Kollenbaum borrows her uncle Al’s Ford Pinto for the cover shot of the exposé that put Mother Jones on the map. 
November 1977 
“When Mother Jones asked me to write about women and success, I thought: How optimistic, so few of us are in danger of it.” —Rita Mae Brown 
June 1978 
Remember barcode moral panic? 
December 1978 
With the Center for Investigative Reporting, we dig into the quasi-religious self-help group EST. 
January 1979 
Tobacco companies pull years’ worth of ads as a result of this story. 
July 1981 
“The sailor pissing over the side is a more important source of pollution” than nuclear waste dumping, says a former Atomic Energy Commission official. 
November 1982 
A deep dive into STDs zeroes in on a mysterious illness “causing a trembling among doctors and gay men.” 
January 1983 
Christopher Hitchens memorably skewers Tom Wolfe’s chummy relationships with conservative elites. 
June 1983 
Co-founder Adam Hochschild and photographer Susan Meiselas expose the truth about a US-funded dirty war. 
December 1983 
Arlie Russell Hochschild, writing about men telling women to smile more, coins the phrase “emotional labor.” 
October 1984 
William Styron! 
Kurt Vonnegut! 
Al Franken! 
Carolyn Forché! 
May 1985 
Doonesbury creator Garry Trudeau illustrates a still-familiar tension. 
September 1986 
Michael Moore’s first issue as MoJo’s editor, in what would be a fiery four-month stint. 
He famously took his settlement pay to help make Roger & Me. 
October 1987 
As Editor Douglas Foster later notes, the answer to this question is: “To win.” 
June 1988 
Or, as we call it, “the sex tornado issue.” 
May 1989 
A smoldering Bono in our “People, Politics, and Other Passions” era. 
September 1989 
Resting Spike face. 
August 1990 
The first of Ralph’s short-lived “Nader’s Nineties” columns. 
June 1991 
Bart Simpson’s second cover appearance, along with his sister Lisa—a MoJo reader if ever there was one. 
February 1992 
When the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons calls small breasts “deformities,” you have to put a boob on the cover. 
February 1997 
Artist Philip Burke captures the controlled chaos of political celebrity for several covers in the ’90s. 
February 1998 
Bill Gates, writes Editor Jeffrey Klein, was “instrumental in making a mindless world attractive.” 
October 2000 
We skewer the overhyped threat of a foreign terrorist attack—a year before 9/11. 
Whoops. 
June 2005 
The “scientists disagree” narrative has held up climate action for decades. 
We expose how ExxonMobil created it. 
October 2006 
An exhaustive timeline of how the George W. 
Bush administration—with the help of mainstream media—sold the Iraq War. 
February 2007 
Jack Hitt’s provocative essay could’ve run anytime in the previous—or following—decade. 
April 2007 
Here’s hoping we don’t end up making an Iran Handbook for Dummies cover. 
February 2009 
We didn’t know just how much of a balancing act the Obama years would be. 
October 2010 
Julia Whitty unmasks BP’s lies about its “cleanup” of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. 
December 2010 
Nailed it. 
August 2011 
Co-Editors Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery unpack the “do more with less” trend. 
April 2012 
Gabriel Mac goes undercover in the e-commerce supply chain. 
February 2013 
Kevin Drum probes reams of research to deliver a compelling thesis: Lead exposure caused the spike in violent crime in the late ’70s and ’80s. 
August 2014 
Dan Schulman gives the dark-money Koch brothers the tabloid treatment. 
June 2015 
Our deep data dive finds that gun violence costs America $229 billion a year—more than $700 per person. 
October 2015 
Tim Murphy profiles Bernie Sanders, whose wild presidential run is still on the Mount Rushmore of populist insurgencies. 
August 2016 
Shane Bauer’s epic undercover investigation causes private prison company stock to tank. 
October 2016 
The first of our 18(!) 
Donald Trump covers. 
(Bill Clinton and George W. 
Bush tie for second, with five covers each.) 
August 2017 
The definitive guide to the hack-and-leak operation that threatened American democracy. 
December 2018 
Okay, so maybe we were a bit optimistic… 
April 2019 
As many publishers cut deals with Facebook, we expose how it is poisoning the information ecosystem. 
October 2020 
While police protests grip the country, Samantha Michaels spotlights alternative visions of community safety. 
June 2023 
Frequent contributor Bill McKibben pushes progressives to build, baby, build. 
February 2024 
A year before Big Tech overlords join Trump on the inauguration stage, our oligarchy issue calls it what it is. 
April 2026 
This callback to our first cover features Pete Hegseth bringing up the rear, bottle in hand. 
For more on our 50th anniversary, check out Exploding Cars, Office Monkeys, Watergate: The Origins of Mother Jones; The Stunning Photojournalism That Made Mother Jones; and Women’s Work: My Barrier-Breaking Early Years at Mother Jones. 
And don’t miss the More to the Story episode “Exploding Pintos, Imploding Politics: Celebrating 50 Years of Fearless Journalism” and MoJo Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery and co-founder Adam Hochschild’s conversation on KQED’s Forum. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.1%Ian Gordon: 2.5%Mother Jones: 4.0%Confirmation Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Ian Gordon: 1.2%Mother Jones: 3.3%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 2.9%Ian Gordon: 0.7%Mother Jones: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 2.9%Ian Gordon: 3.9%Mother Jones: 0.8%Hindsight Bias2.9%This article: 5.6%Ian Gordon: 2.1%Mother Jones: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.6%This article: 5.2%Ian Gordon: 5.0%Mother Jones: 7.2%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Ian Gordon: 0.8%Mother Jones: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Ian Gordon: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.6%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 4.2%Ian Gordon: 1.4%Mother Jones: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 21.7%Ian Gordon: 6.3%Mother Jones: 9.6%Negativity Bias21.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.8%Mother Jones: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Ian Gordon: 0.5%Mother Jones: 1.0%In-Group Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Ian Gordon: 2.4%Mother Jones: 1.5%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Ian Gordon: 1.7%Mother Jones: 1.9%Ad Hominem4.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.5%Ian Gordon: 1.6%Mother Jones: 3.6%Appeal to Authority6.5%This article: 2.3%Ian Gordon: 1.1%Mother Jones: 1.4%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.5%Ian Gordon: 0.6%Mother Jones: 4.7%Hasty Generalization2.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.0%Ian Gordon: 0.3%Mother Jones: 0.5%Bandwagon1.0%This article: 8.0%Ian Gordon: 2.0%Mother Jones: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.9%Ian Gordon: 3.4%Mother Jones: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.7%Ian Gordon: 1.2%Mother Jones: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Ian Gordon: 0.5%Mother Jones: 2.3%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Ian Gordon: 1.8%Mother Jones: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Gordon: 0.0%Mother Jones: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%Ian Gordon: 1.2%Mother Jones: 1.8%Unattributed Quote4.7%This article: 1.4%Ian Gordon: 1.0%Mother Jones: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 37.0%Ian Gordon: 17.9%Mother Jones: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice37.0%This article: 2.4%Ian Gordon: 0.6%Mother Jones: 1.8%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 8.4%Ian Gordon: 8.0%Mother Jones: 4.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias8.4%This article: 2.1%Ian Gordon: 0.5%Mother Jones: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.1%This article: 10.3%Ian Gordon: 6.0%Mother Jones: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.3%

972 words analyzed.

Speakers

17speakers28%attributed speech700writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDugald Stermer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLouise Kollenbaum • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageRita Mae Brown • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCenter for Investigative Reporting • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageChristopher Hitchens • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageArlie Russell Hochschild • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGarry Trudeau • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDouglas Foster • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coveragePhilip Burke • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Klein • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJulia Whitty • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGabriel Mac • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Drum • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDan Schulman • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageTim Murphy • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSamantha Michaels • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words8.1% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +88.9 ptsWriter: 11.1%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.9 ptsWriter: 40.9%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.