A Manitoba Pride group turned a vandalized billboard into a successful protest campaign ⁠20%

6/25/2026, 5:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (17,602 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the article peer group.

After a Pride billboard in Pembina Valley, Manitoba, was vandalized, the local Pride group put an image of the defaced sign on t-shirts with the slogan, “You Can’t Spray Away The Gay.” 
The result was one of their most successful campaigns so far. 
Pauline Emerson-Froebe, President of Pembina Valley Pride, explains. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.2%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias17.2%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic17.2%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect20.3%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 50.0%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias50.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.2%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal17.2%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.5%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote12.5%This article: 12.5%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection12.5%This article: 37.5%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice37.5%This article: 50.0%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination50.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 50.0%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…50.0%

64 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech56writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coveragePauline Emerson-Froebe • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Pauline Emerson-Froebe: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Pauline Emerson-Froebe: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-57.1 ptsWriter: 57.1%Pauline Emerson-Froebe: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -57.1 ptsWriter: 57.1%Pauline Emerson-Froebe: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-42.9 ptsWriter: 42.9%Pauline Emerson-Froebe: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.