Detainees at El Paso ICE detention say they’re frequently beaten, report says 71%

By Associated Press60%

7/15/2026, 9:04:40 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 738 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.9% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,339 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  Dozens of people held at a sprawling Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Texas say they were either beaten by guards or witnessed others being beaten, according to a new report issued by legal and human rights advocates. 
The 84-page report issued jointly Wednesday by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union also says men and women held at Camp East Montana, located at the U.S. 
Army’s Fort Bliss in El Paso, recounted being denied necessary medical care, forced to live in filthy conditions and fed inedible meals. 
Detainees also said they were prevented from contacting their lawyers or family members. 
Of the 71 detainees contacted over a five month period, 64  about 90% of those interviewed  said they had either personally been assaulted by the staff or had seen others physically abused, according to the report. 
“ICE’s Camp East Montana is a human rights disaster,” said Angélica César, a fellow at Human Rights Watch and the ACLU who was a lead researcher for the report. 
“The U.S. government should shut it down, conduct independent investigations into all abuses and deaths in custody, and put an end to mass deportations and mandatory immigration detention.” 
The Department of Homeland Security, which includes ICE, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
The new accounts of violence and substandard living conditions inside Camp East Montana are consistent with earlier reports by The Associated Press and others. 
At least three detainees held at the facility since it opened in August have died, including a 55-year-old Cuban migrant who was handcuffed and stopped breathing earlier this year after being held down by guards. 
A local medical examiner later ruled that death a homicide and a federal report issued last month said evidence in the case was “missing or destroyed.” 
That report by the Government Accountability Office found mismanagement by the Department of Homeland Security had created unsafe conditions that contributed to detainee deaths and suffering even as millions of wasted tax dollars enriched contractors. 
In March, ICE replaced Acquisition Logistics, LLC, the prime contractor that had been awarded a deal last year worth up to $1.3 billion to build and manage the camp. 
The Virginia company had no prior experience running an ICE detention facility, had never won a federal contract worth more than $16 million and lacked a functioning website. 
The change came as an internal ICE review documented 49 deficiencies, which it defines as violations of detention standards or policies, in areas including the use of force and restraints, security and medical care. 
Despite the change in contractors, interviews conducted by Human Rights Watch and the ACLU as recently as last month found serious problems at the camp have persisted. 
Detainees recounted degrading and inhumane living conditions that included bathrooms covered in feces, flooded housing units and no access to soap or other basic hygiene supplies, according to the report. 
They also reported being held indoors for weeks without meaningful access to recreation, sunlight or fresh air. 
People also described receiving spoiled food and inconsistent meal schedules, with delays of up to 12 hours between meals. 
The report recounts detainees saying that guards beat detainees in response to hunger strikes, requests for medical attention and complaints regarding detention conditions. 
Several people said that guards imposed collective punishment, striking or assaulting multiple people after accusing one detainee of violating rules, according to the report. 
Researchers found that staff pressured and coerced those held there into abandoning immigration claims and accepting removal to third countries if they could not be sent back to their own country. 
The detainees said they were threatened with violence, criminal prosecution, and indefinite detention if they refused deportation. 
In some cases, the report concluded, the circumstances of ICE detention could amount to enforced disappearances, a potential violation of international human rights law. 
Human Rights Watch and the ACLU called on the Trump administration to close Camp East Montana and to allow independent investigations into deaths in custody, excessive force, medical neglect and enforced disappearances. 
“The abuses documented at Fort Bliss are the predictable outcome of the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda, its brutal expansion of immigration detention, and the erosion of federal oversight mechanisms,” said César, the lead researcher. 
“People at Camp East Montana are human beings who deserve to be treated with dignity and protected from harm.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.9%Associated Press: 2.2%The Texas Tribune: 2.6%Confirmation Bias11.9%This article: 4.6%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 15.0%Associated Press: 3.2%The Texas Tribune: 2.9%Availability Heuristic15.0%This article: 12.2%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic12.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 7.1%The Texas Tribune: 4.9%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%The Texas Tribune: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Associated Press: 1.6%The Texas Tribune: 1.5%Pessimism Bias8.7%This article: 37.3%Associated Press: 8.7%The Texas Tribune: 7.7%Negativity Bias37.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%The Texas Tribune: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error8.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.0%The Texas Tribune: 1.4%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Associated Press: 1.4%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.8%Associated Press: 3.4%The Texas Tribune: 3.4%Appeal to Authority10.8%This article: 3.8%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 3.8%Associated Press: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Slippery Slope3.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.6%Associated Press: 2.7%The Texas Tribune: 2.8%Hasty Generalization14.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.3%Associated Press: 0.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Bandwagon4.3%This article: 20.7%Associated Press: 4.7%The Texas Tribune: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion20.7%This article: 8.9%Associated Press: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Begging the Question8.9%This article: 21.1%Associated Press: 2.2%The Texas Tribune: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 33.6%Associated Press: 1.7%The Texas Tribune: 1.7%Anecdotal33.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Associated Press: 1.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Associated Press: 1.3%The Texas Tribune: 0.8%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 1.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.1%This article: 5.4%Associated Press: 3.0%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice5.4%This article: 10.7%Associated Press: 0.7%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%Indoctrination10.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Associated Press: 0.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

738 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers19%attributed speech595writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageAngélica César • 29 words • 100.0% coverageAngélica César • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageHuman Rights Watch and the ACLU • 32 words • 100.0% coverageCésar • 35 words • 0.0% coverageCésar • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Angélica César

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words40% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+50.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Angélica César: 50.9%50.9%Indoctrination+49.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Angélica César: 49.1%49.1%Biased Writer Voice+47.1 ptsWriter: 2.0%Angélica César: 49.1%49.1%Quote-first Misdirection-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Angélica César: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.