Newsweek32%

Iran retaliates after fourth night of US strikes - Newsweek 24%

By Brendan Cole35%

7/13/2026, 12:15:20 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 2,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 916 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of 24% (15,678 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the article peer group.

Newsweek is a Trust Project member 
See more of our trusted coverage when you search. to see more of our trusted coverage when you search. 
Tehran said it had launched a new wave of retaliatory missile and drone attacks against U.S. military naval assets in the Middle East, as the fight for control of the Strait of Hormuz deepens. 
The Iranian actions were in response to the U.S. attacks on sites in Iran on Sunday, including on air defense systems, radar sites, missile and drone equipment and small boats. 
Washington is aiming to degrade Iran’s ability to target civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz which U.S. 
Central Command said, “Iran does not control.” 
Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) said on Monday that the waterway “is our territory” and claimed to have closed it again, adding to uncertainty over whether full access through it can fully resume. 
During the Iran War, Tehran had blocked the waterway critical for energy exports, which upended global energy markets. 
A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Washington and Tehran agreed on June 17 partially reopened it, though not to pre-war levels. 
“The Strait has become the United States' Achilles' heel in this conflict and Iran's strongest bargaining chip,” Susannah Streeter, markets expert and chief investment strategist at the broker Wealth Club, told Newsweek on Monday. 
Iran Launches Missiles at US Targets 
A weekend of attacks from both sides marked the latest hostilities threatening the June 17 memorandum of understanding (MOU). 
U.S. 
Central Command said it had struck 140 targets, including missile and drone launch sites, ammunition dumps, communication equipment. 
Iranian media said on Monday that in retaliation, Tehran had launched ballistic missiles from western and central Iran toward U.S. bases and vessels. 
In Bahrain, which hosts the U.S. 
Navy’s 5th Fleet, missile alert sirens were heard. 
Kuwait said it had intercepted hostile fire, while Jordan reported it had downed four Iranian missiles. 
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said missile and drone strikes had hit facilities in Juffair, Bahrain, and destroyed two radars in Oman, adding that the strait would only reopen to shipping after U.S. military activity there ended. 
State news agency IRNA reported that the IRGC's Aerospace Force had "completely destroyed fuel depots and a Patriot air defense system at the US base in Ali Al Salem, Kuwait, as well as an FPS strategic radar system at the Ahmed Al-Jaber base." 
This has not been independently confirmed. 
Iranian media also reported that U.S. attacks had hit Hormozgan and Khuzestan provinces in the southern part of the country and Markazi province near Tehran. 
At least two people were killed. 
Strikes on Sistan and Baluchestan provinces, also in the south bordeing the waterway, were also reported. 
Iran and US Wrangle Over Hormuz Control 
The hostilities underline the importance of fully freeing up the Strait of Hormuz, through which one fifth of the world’s oil and gas transited before the war. 
Intelligence platform Kpler said Monday that confirmed Strait of Hormuz crossings declined by around 52 percent week- on-week, over July 10 to 12, with traffic reverting to more defensive routing patterns. 
Clause 5 of the MOU announced on June 17 required Tehran to discuss the future administration and maritime services” of the strait with Oman, which borders the waterway and other Persian Gulf littoral states. 
The U.S. has said that the waterway is open but Tehran insists it is controlling it as it aims to charge tolls for transiting, which is counter to international maritime law. 
In its analysis on Sunday, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said that Iran was refusing any arrangement that undermines its control over the waterway. 
“Iran views control over the Strait of Hormuz as a major strategic objective, and its leaders believe that if Iran ends the war without control of the strait, the war would end in a serious strategic defeat,” the Washington, D.C, think tank said. 
Streeter from the Wealth Club said that with the chance of negotiations between seizing up again, and this fresh flare-up of attacks has caused oil prices to increase by 4 percent on Monday, to above $79 a barrel for Brent crude, the global benchmark. 
“While prices are still not at crisis levels, the creep upwards will ignite fresh inflationary worries and concerns about how far higher interest rates could move,” Streeter said. 
Timeline From Framework MOU Deal 
June 17: The U.S. and Iran sign a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to end the Iran War and kickstart 60 days of negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program. 
June 26: Tehran is accused of violating the truce with an attack on a cargo ship that prompts the U.S. launch fresh strikes on Iran. 
July 7: The U.S. launches 80 more strikes following Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz. 
Tehran targets U.S. military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait. 
July 8: While at the NATO summit in Ankara, President Donald Trump declares the ceasefire with Iran "over." 
July 11: U.S. officials demand Tehran state that the Strait of Hormuz is open. 
July 12: The U.S, launches further attacks on Iran following attacks in the Strait. 
Tehran retaliated with strikes at U.S. bases in the region. 
July 13: Iranian attacks on U.S. military assets are reported. 
The U.S. said it had hit dozens of sites across the region. 
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Frances Mao and Yannick Demoustier . 
Request Reprint & Licensing 
View Editorial & AI Guidelines 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Brendan Cole: 2.5%Newsweek: 2.9%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Brendan Cole: 2.9%Newsweek: 2.7%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 9.8%Brendan Cole: 0.7%Newsweek: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic9.8%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Brendan Cole: 2.2%Newsweek: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias6.7%This article: 24.0%Brendan Cole: 4.6%Newsweek: 6.4%Framing Effect24.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.2%Brendan Cole: 0.7%Newsweek: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 2.8%Newsweek: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Brendan Cole: 2.1%Newsweek: 1.5%Pessimism Bias7.5%This article: 28.4%Brendan Cole: 7.4%Newsweek: 6.6%Negativity Bias28.4%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 1.9%Newsweek: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Brendan Cole: 1.2%Newsweek: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error7.0%This article: 7.4%Brendan Cole: 0.5%Newsweek: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 1.2%Newsweek: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Brendan Cole: 0.9%Newsweek: 2.0%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%Brendan Cole: 2.3%Newsweek: 1.5%Recency Bias8.3%This article: 0.5%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.5%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.8%Newsweek: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.7%Brendan Cole: 6.4%Newsweek: 4.2%Appeal to Authority26.7%This article: 2.1%Brendan Cole: 1.3%Newsweek: 1.9%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 3.1%Brendan Cole: 1.5%Newsweek: 0.9%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.4%Brendan Cole: 3.2%Newsweek: 4.5%Hasty Generalization7.4%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.6%Brendan Cole: 3.8%Newsweek: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion3.6%This article: 8.1%Brendan Cole: 1.2%Newsweek: 0.9%Begging the Question8.1%This article: 22.8%Brendan Cole: 2.7%Newsweek: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.8%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.7%Brendan Cole: 0.6%Newsweek: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.7%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.3%Newsweek: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.9%Brendan Cole: 0.1%Newsweek: 1.3%Anecdotal0.9%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.9%Brendan Cole: 1.7%Newsweek: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.9%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.1%Newsweek: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.6%Newsweek: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.2%Newsweek: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.2%Brendan Cole: 1.7%Newsweek: 1.5%Unattributed Quote17.2%This article: 8.4%Brendan Cole: 3.1%Newsweek: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection8.4%This article: 8.1%Brendan Cole: 1.3%Newsweek: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice8.1%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.4%Newsweek: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brendan Cole: 0.0%Newsweek: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Brendan Cole: 0.4%Newsweek: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.0%

916 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers37%attributed speech580writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageNewsweek • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guard (IRGC) • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSusannah Streeter • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guards • 35 words • 0.0% coverageIRNA • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKpler • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageInstitute for the Study of War (ISW) • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageSusannah Streeter • 44 words • 0.0% coverageSusannah Streeter • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNewsweek • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

IRNA

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words13% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%IRNA: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-21.6 ptsWriter: 21.6%IRNA: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%IRNA: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%IRNA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.