BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (12,719 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

The Medical News Today (MNT) website is a leading source of health information. 
It provides a wide range of articles on various medical conditions, treatments, and wellness topics. 
The website aims to deliver accurate and up-to-date health news to a global audience. 
MNT covers a broad spectrum of health subjects, including diseases, symptoms, diagnostic methods, and treatment options. 
It also features articles on lifestyle, nutrition, mental health, and medical research. 
The content is typically written by medical professionals or experienced health journalists, ensuring a high level of credibility. 
MNT is committed to making complex medical information accessible and understandable to the general public. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.4%Medical News Today: 1.8%Availability Heuristic11.4%This article: 29.5%Medical News Today: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic29.5%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.6%Medical News Today: 2.5%Framing Effect27.6%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 27.6%Medical News Today: 6.4%Optimism Bias27.6%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 2.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 29.5%Medical News Today: 1.3%Halo Effect29.5%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 42.9%Medical News Today: 4.8%Appeal to Authority42.9%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.3%Medical News Today: 3.6%Hasty Generalization14.3%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 15.2%Medical News Today: 0.4%Composition/Division15.2%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 29.5%Medical News Today: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice29.5%This article: 13.3%Medical News Today: 2.8%Indoctrination13.3%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

105 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker81%attributed speech20writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 13 words • 100.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 15 words • 0.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 14 words • 100.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 16 words • 0.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageThe Medical News Today (MNT) website • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words100% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%45.0%90.0%Biased Writer Voice-74.7 ptsWriter: 90.0%The Medical News Today (MNT) website: 15.3%15.3%Indoctrination+16.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Medical News Today (MNT) website: 16.5%16.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.