Decoration Day, precursor to Memorial Day, was once 'bigger than Christmas' in part of Missouri 82%

By Kaitlyn McConnell0%

5/16/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,002 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 73.6% and a BS Rank of 82% (4,017 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the article peer group.

I'm walking through history right now at Linden Cemetery in rural Christian County, Missouri. 
Beneath this sunny sky, accompanied by birds, breeze and traffic from a nearby road, I'm thinking about May 30, 1915, when I've read that 500 people gathered here for Decoration Day. 
Ozarkers came to decorate graves with flowers, to reminisce and remember "friends and loved ones who have gone to that undiscovered country from which no traveler returns," the local newspaper columnist noted. 
In the past, Decoration Day was a big deal for cemeteries across our rural region and beyond. 
The observance began after the Civil War to honor fallen soldiers. 
Over time, it grew into decorating graves of all loved ones. 
Today, that event has morphed into Memorial Day. 
There is a parallel of "decorating" graves with flowers, but the events are quite different. 
In the past, Decoration Day was recognized on May 30 and was a celebration like a reunion. 
And that effort took those folks to the Linden Cemetery in 1915. 
The day was filled with dinner, at least one talk from a Professor Hendricks and decorating the graves. 
As the paper put it, "after the exercises were over, all returned to their homes feeling that they had done their duty in remembrance of the departed friends and relatives." 
That sounds pretty solemn, but Decoration Day was also about fun, friends and family. 
"When I was doing interviews with people, I had somebody, one man, tell me that it was a bigger day than Christmas," said Abby Burnett, an expert on Arkansas cemeteries and customs, traditions that often mirror rural Missouri in days gone by. 
"You got new clothes for Decoration. 
You saw your relatives. 
You had the best food. 
You saw your cousins." 
Burnett said Decoration Day often came after a once-a-year cleanup. 
"Just before Decoration, you have a working day," Burnett said. 
"And there are pictures of people, women in big bonnets, old clothes, men in overalls, really looking dirty, holding their implements, rakes, shovels, loppers, and they would go in and lop out all the brush, restack any stacked-stone graves, write any toppled tombstones and get it ready for the Decoration. 
And that was a whole separate thing, because it was so much work." 
These stories make me turn to May Kennedy McCord, an Ozarks chronicler in the early 20th century. 
In 1938, she wrote about Decoration Day with nostalgia, recalling its place in close-connected community life. 
Here's part of what she wrote: 
"There is something so sweet about Decoration Day in the country and little village graveyards that just simply is not there in the formality and ceremony of the larger cemeteries. 
We know where everyone is buried and when they were buried. 
We know all their people  we know the circumstances of their death. 
We visit and recall the old days. 
We divide flowers and there is such a sweetness of spirit and such a tenderness and sense of peace out on the sun-bathed hill." 
"Sometimes we would take a picnic lunch  not to spread out with everybody, but just for ourselves, and sit on the steps out there, maybe eat it, or spread a blanket somewhere," said Lola Belle Underwood, who remembers Decoration Day observances long past. 
She has lived most of her 89 years in rural Webster County, Missouri, and attended various observances as a child. 
The flowers her family brought were often what they found nearby. 
She points to a jar on her table filled with purple, white and pink flowers, including some vibrant peonies. 
She said that was similar to what they took to places like Marshfield and rural Pleasant Hill. 
"We brought what we had in our yard," she said. 
"We always took it in a mason jar. 
As I recall, Marshfield had water fountains there, but out in the country, we'd take our own jug of water to fill with the vases. 
My sister was talking to one of her friends this morning, and she said they always took tin cans and aluminum foil, tin foil to decorate it up a little bit make it look a little nicer." 
At other times, people made flowers from crepe paper. 
One book from the 1920s gave detailed instructions to make 30 different types, including apple blossom and wisteria. 
Sometimes the flowers were dipped in wax to make them last longer. 
But they didn't stay the same forever, and neither did Decoration Day. 
Burnett said that was likely due to cascading social shifts around the Great Depression and World War II. 
People left the Ozarks  for war and in search of a better life  and many of them didn't return. 
"Everything starts changing," Burnett said. 
"But people, even the ones, when they do come back ... 
I don't think the traditions were maintained." 
An official nail in the coffin was in 1971, when Memorial Day as we know it now was declared a federal holiday. 
People today visit cemeteries gradually, eliminating the feel of Decoration Day when folks were there at the same time. 
But there are still places across the Ozarks that specifically mark Decoration Day with a service and dinner on the grounds, even if it's not on May 30. 
For a second, let's go back to Linden. 
As I walk through the cemetery, I'm thinking about the people buried here and the little white church where folks used to gather. 
Perhaps some of the people buried here were at that Decoration Day in 1915. 
But to me, all of these layers remind me of the importance of place and connection to where we are. 
Even if Decoration Day isn't widely recognized any longer, we can still find meaning in the places and spaces that link generations of us. 
This story was first published by KSMU. 
Kaitlyn McConnell is the founder of Ozarks Alive, a cultural preservation project that documents the region's history, people and places. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 4.6%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.6%This article: 25.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic25.0%This article: 15.6%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic15.6%This article: 3.1%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias3.1%This article: 2.6%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 4.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 5.2%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion5.2%This article: 1.9%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 2.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias2.0%This article: 9.1%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect12.4%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 5.8%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.2%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority16.2%This article: 5.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 4.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope4.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 34.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization34.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.7%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion14.7%This article: 2.2%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 12.8%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.8%This article: 3.7%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque3.7%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.8%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division3.8%This article: 37.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal37.4%This article: 3.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.0%This article: 4.1%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground1.5%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 28.6%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote28.6%This article: 4.2%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.2%This article: 3.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 2.4%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kaitlyn McConnell: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1002 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers42%attributed speech580writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 42 words • 100.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 50 words • 100.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMay Kennedy McCord • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMay Kennedy McCord • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMay Kennedy McCord • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMay Kennedy McCord • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMay Kennedy McCord • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLola Belle Underwood • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLola Belle Underwood • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLola Belle Underwood • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLola Belle Underwood • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLola Belle Underwood • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 21 words • 100.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAbby Burnett • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageKSMU • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abby Burnett

100%flagged-word coverage
206 attributed words49% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+10.8 ptsWriter: 29.0%Abby Burnett: 39.8%39.8%Quote-first Misdirection+20.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Abby Burnett: 20.4%20.4%Biased Writer Voice-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Abby Burnett: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Abby Burnett: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.