STLPR0%

Missouri legislature passes wide-ranging crime bill including easier expungements 3%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

5/15/2026, 2:00:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 385 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,392 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the article peer group.

The Missouri House finished work Friday on a wide-ranging public safety bill that includes an automatic expungement program for some misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies. 
The House voted 110-25 to send SB 1421 to Gov. 
Mike Kehoe’s desk. 
Among the provisions is what’s known as “Clean Slate” legislation, which automatically expunges misdemeanors after one year and nonviolent felonies after three years. 
Sen. 
Brian Williams, D-St. 
Louis County, said the program would be run by the Missouri Highway Patrol, as opposed to individual court officials. 
“They will scan everyone by a code of their offense. 
And then they will wake up, essentially the next morning, and their record would be cleared,” Williams said. 
“We're eliminating the process of clerks having to do paperwork. 
We're eliminating the courts in a way of someone having to file a petition, which is very expensive, and get a lawyer to get their record expunged.” 
Williams and other proponents of the automatic expungement proposals said the program could help nonviolent offenders find stable employment. 
He co-sponsored the legislation with Sen. 
Nick Schroer, R-St. 
Charles County. 
“I think it is an issue that shouldn't be partisan,” Williams said. 
“I'm glad there are colleagues on both sides of the aisle that see value in putting people on a pathway to be model citizens and not being hindered by a previous mistake that can easily happen to anyone in our community.” 
Other parts of the public safety bill include: 
Restricting the flight of unmanned aircraft, like drones, over open-air facilities such as stadiums. 
Tying the salaries of certain prosecuting attorneys with the salary of a Circuit Court judge. 
Creating an offense of “masked intimidation,” which is defined by someone who intentionally “harasses, intimidates, or threatens any other person while hiding or concealing their face with a mask, hood, or any other article or device” with the intent “to place another person in reasonable fear for their physical safety.” 
It does not encompass people who wear a mask with their job or for any activities protected by the First Amendment. 
Establishing the offense of gift card fraud. 
Requiring someone who is convicted of killing a parent in a DUI car accident to pay child support. 
Mandating background checks for staff who work at overnight or residential camps. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon3.1%This article: 10.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

385 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker41%attributed speech229writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Williams • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brian Williams

88%flagged-word coverage
156 attributed words100% of attributed speech22% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.