STLPR0%

Festus council member steps down amid data center backlash 4%

By Katie Grawitch0%

4/17/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 465 faulty-reasoning hits from 324 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,110 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the article peer group.

Festus City Council member Staci Templeton resigned on Saturday after five years in office. 
The Ward 2 councilwoman is the latest member to leave office during data center backlash. 
Festus residents voted out all four council members running for reelection last week in favor of candidates who opposed a proposed hyperscale data center project. 
Templeton has taken part in the council's unanimous decisions leading up to a proposed hyperscale data center in the city's 4th Ward. 
But she voted against an agreement setting requirements for data center developer CRG alongside fellow Ward 2 council member Brian Wehner. 
Wehner was one of the council members unseated last week. 
Mayor Sam Richards said Templeton announced her resignation privately on Saturday but agreed to stay on for the Monday city council meeting at his request. 
Four new council members were sworn in Monday night before the council elected pro-data center member Mike Cook as mayor pro tempore. 
In that meeting, Templeton tied the vote in favor of Cook over anti-data center council newcomer Rick Belleville. 
The mayor had the tie-breaking vote to elect Cook. 
“I just asked her to make the council meeting on Monday and then (said) she could resign after that meeting,” Richards said. 
“And that's what she did.” 
Richards said Templeton left for personal reasons. 
Richards will choose a new candidate for the vacant seat. 
Then, the remaining members will decide whether to approve them. 
Council members serve two-year terms  and one member from each of the city's four wards is up for election every year. 
Data center opposition group Wake Up Jeffco and four Festus residents are suing the city and CRG, claiming city officials knowingly withheld information about the potential development that was within the public interest. 
The suit aims to invalidate the city's requirements for the developer and reverse rezoning decisions related to the area set aside for the proposed project. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.2%Katie Grawitch: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.7%Katie Grawitch: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.7%Katie Grawitch: 8.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect37.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 25.3%Katie Grawitch: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Katie Grawitch: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias7.7%This article: 6.5%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.8%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon6.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 6.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 10.2%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question10.2%This article: 7.7%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.4%Katie Grawitch: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.2%Katie Grawitch: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote10.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.4%Katie Grawitch: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Grawitch: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

324 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker21%attributed speech255writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSam Richards • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSam Richards • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSam Richards • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSam Richards • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSam Richards • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sam Richards

10%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words100% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-12.9 ptsWriter: 12.9%Sam Richards: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Sam Richards: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.