STLPR⁠0%

Missouri election results: St. Louis, St. Charles and Jefferson County ⁠2%

By Kate Grumke⁠52% Katie Grawitch⁠0%

4/7/2026, 11:30:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 16 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (20,945 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the article peer group.

Voters in the St. 
Louis area cast ballots on Tuesday for municipal and school board races. 
Key races in the region include whether to renew the St. 
Louis 1% earnings tax, Francis Howell School Board elections and a handful of contested mayoral races. 
Polls closed at 7 p.m. 
Results below will update periodically throughout election night. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 24.2%Kate Grumke: 6.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect24.2%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 5.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 8.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 3.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kate Grumke: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

66 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.