Did Stalin Pluck a Live Chicken as a Lesson to His Followers? 13%

By David Mikkelson0%

5/4/2020, 12:00:40 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,199 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the article peer group.

A common item of interest on social media is a rather gruesome anecdote attributed to Soviet leader Josef Stalin, which describes him purportedly plucking a live chicken in order to demonstrate "how easy it is to govern stupid people": 
We found no sources for this anecdote that were contemporaneous with Stalin's life (he died in 1953), nor from the next few decades afterwards. 
The earliest recountings of it seem to date from the early 1990s or late 1980s, which is consistent with the following excerpt from a 1988 New Yorker article that attributes it to the mid-1980s writings of anti-Stalinist Soviet/Kyrgyz author Chingiz Aitmatov: 
> Stalin called together his closest comrades-in-arms. 
"I understand you're wondering how I govern the people so that every last one of them ... thinks of me as a living god. 
Now I'll teach you the right attitude toward the people." 
And he ordered a chicken brought in. 
He plucked it live, in front of them all, down to the last feather, down to the red flesh, until only the comb was left on its head. 
"And now watch," he said, and let the chicken go. 
It could have gone off where it wished, but it went nowhere. 
It was too hot in the sun and too cold in the shade. 
The poor bird could only press itself against Stalin's boots. 
And then he tossed it a crumb of grain, and the bird followed him wherever he went. 
Otherwise, it would have fallen over from hunger. 
"That," he told his pupils, "is how you govern our people." 
Aitmatov appears to be the source of this tale, but as noted in the above New Yorker article and a 2008 Reuters obituary for Aitmatov, he wrote in "elliptical, allegorical ways," and his works "often interwove popular myths and folktales to create allegorical themes populated with down-to-earth characters." 
Aitmatov acknowledged that of himself as well, writing in the introduction to his novel "The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years": 
> As in previous works, here I also draw on legends and myths handed down to us from former generations; together with these, for the first time in my writing career I also use fantasy to form part of the story. 
But, for me, neither is an end in itself, simply a method of expressing thoughts, a means of identifying and interpreting realities. 
Given that Aitmatov is the apparent source for this anecdote, that it did not first appear until some 30 years after Stalin's death, and that Aitmatov was known for his use of allegory, most likely the tale is not a literal account of something Stalin did, but rather an illustrative sketch that Aitmatov either invented himself or heard elsewhere and subsequently attributed to Stalin. 
We therefore rate this claim "Legend." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%David Mikkelson: 1.8%Snopes: 2.4%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 8.6%David Mikkelson: 1.2%Snopes: 0.8%Anchoring Bias8.6%This article: 8.2%David Mikkelson: 3.3%Snopes: 3.4%Availability Heuristic8.2%This article: 13.4%David Mikkelson: 0.8%Snopes: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic13.4%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.2%Snopes: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%David Mikkelson: 1.2%Snopes: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias13.4%This article: 3.8%David Mikkelson: 2.9%Snopes: 2.4%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.7%Snopes: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.3%Snopes: 0.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%David Mikkelson: 0.7%Snopes: 0.4%Pessimism Bias1.3%This article: 16.2%David Mikkelson: 9.2%Snopes: 5.1%Negativity Bias16.2%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.6%Snopes: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 2.9%Snopes: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 3.5%Snopes: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.7%Snopes: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.1%Snopes: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 1.8%Snopes: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.5%Snopes: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 12.6%Snopes: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 2.1%Snopes: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.7%David Mikkelson: 3.2%Snopes: 6.0%Appeal to Authority14.7%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 1.2%Snopes: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.8%Snopes: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 22.1%David Mikkelson: 7.9%Snopes: 3.5%Hasty Generalization22.1%This article: 2.5%David Mikkelson: 0.4%Snopes: 0.7%Red Herring2.5%This article: 8.2%David Mikkelson: 1.4%Snopes: 1.5%Bandwagon8.2%This article: 15.3%David Mikkelson: 5.0%Snopes: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion15.3%This article: 4.6%David Mikkelson: 0.4%Snopes: 0.4%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 19.5%David Mikkelson: 3.1%Snopes: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.5%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 1.3%Snopes: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.3%David Mikkelson: 0.4%Snopes: 1.6%Burden of Proof6.3%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 1.2%Snopes: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.6%Snopes: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.5%David Mikkelson: 1.8%Snopes: 1.8%Anecdotal15.5%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.1%David Mikkelson: 1.8%Snopes: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.1%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%David Mikkelson: 0.1%Snopes: 0.1%Middle Ground1.3%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 10.1%David Mikkelson: 0.4%Snopes: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy10.1%This article: 1.5%David Mikkelson: 4.6%Snopes: 3.3%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 21.4%David Mikkelson: 3.2%Snopes: 2.3%Quote-first Misdirection21.4%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 7.6%Snopes: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.3%David Mikkelson: 0.4%Snopes: 0.7%Indoctrination2.3%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 1.3%Snopes: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Mikkelson: 0.0%Snopes: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

476 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech413writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageChingiz Aitmatov • 41 words • 0.0% coverageChingiz Aitmatov • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 64 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chingiz Aitmatov

35%flagged-word coverage
63 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection-24.7 ptsWriter: 24.7%Chingiz Aitmatov: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Chingiz Aitmatov: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Chingiz Aitmatov: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.