Mashable67%

NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for July 8, 2026 11%

By Mashable Team0%

7/8/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Bandwagon, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 489 faulty-reasoning hits from 549 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,495 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the article peer group.

The NYT Connections puzzle today is not too difficult if you're a musician. 
*Connections* is the one of the most popular *New York Times* word games that's captured the public's attention. 
The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." 
And just like *Wordle*, *Connections* resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle. 
If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for today's *Connections* solution. 
But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you. 
SEE ALSO: 
Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable 
What is Connections? 
The *NYT*'s latest daily word game has become a social media hit. 
The *Times* credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. 
*Connections* can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common. 
This Tweet is currently unavailable. 
It might be loading or has been removed. 
Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. 
These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. 
Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. 
If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. 
Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends. 
Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. 
Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. 
Like *Wordle,* you can share the results with your friends on social media. 
NYT Pips hints, answers for July 8, 2026 
Here's a hint for today's Connections categories 
Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? 
Then give these a try: 
Yellow: Shreds 
Green: Idea 
Blue: Rock on! 
Purple: Dwelling 
Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today 
Here are today's Connections categories 
Need a little extra help? 
Today's connections fall into the following categories: 
Yellow: Cut into thin pieces 
Green: Motif 
Blue: Guitar-playing techniques 
Purple: House ___ 
Looking for Wordle today? 
Here's the answer to today's Wordle. 
Ready for the answers? 
This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions. 
Drumroll, please! 
The solution to today's *Connections* #1123 is... 
What is the answer to Connections today 
Cut into thin pieces: GRATE, PLANE, SHAVE, SLIVER 
Motif: DRIFT, PLOT, THEME, THREAD 
Guitar-playing techniques: PICK, PLUCK, STRUM, TAP 
House ___: CARDS, LORDS, WAX, WORSHIP 
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for July 8, 2026 
Are you also playing NYT Strands? 
Get all the Strands hints you need for today's puzzle. 
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! 
Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more. 
Not the day you're after? 
Here's the solution to yesterday's Connections. 
Topics 
Connections 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.1%Mashable Team: 0.1%Mashable: 2.1%Confirmation Bias1.1%This article: 2.9%Mashable Team: 0.7%Mashable: 1.9%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 3.3%Mashable Team: 1.1%Mashable: 3.1%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 1.0%Mashable: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.2%Mashable: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Mashable Team: 2.4%Mashable: 5.2%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 13.7%Mashable Team: 3.5%Mashable: 1.5%Loss Aversion13.7%This article: 3.3%Mashable Team: 0.4%Mashable: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Mashable Team: 1.8%Mashable: 4.2%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 5.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.7%Mashable: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 4.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Mashable Team: 0.4%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Mashable Team: 1.1%Mashable: 3.2%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 3.1%Mashable Team: 0.8%Mashable: 1.3%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.7%Mashable: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Mashable Team: 2.9%Mashable: 5.1%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.4%Mashable Team: 4.4%Mashable: 1.1%Bandwagon6.4%This article: 0.4%Mashable Team: 0.5%Mashable: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion0.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.7%Mashable: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Mashable Team: 1.1%Mashable: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.3%Mashable: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.5%Mashable Team: 1.4%Mashable: 10.3%Biased Writer Voice5.5%This article: 2.0%Mashable Team: 0.7%Mashable: 2.5%Indoctrination2.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable Team: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 28.6%Mashable Team: 11.3%Mashable: 16.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…28.6%

549 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.0%attributed speech505writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMashable • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageThe Times • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMashable • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mashable

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words45% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +72.9 ptsWriter: 27.1%Mashable: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Mashable: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Mashable: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.