Mashable67%

NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for July 12, 2026 16%

7/12/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Bandwagon, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 804 faulty-reasoning hits from 553 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.5% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,574 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the article peer group.

The NYT Connections puzzle today is not too difficult if you know your state capitals. 
Connections is the one of the most popular New York Times word games that's captured the public's attention. 
The game is all about finding the "common threads between words." 
And just like Wordle , Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier-so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle. 
If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for today's Connections solution. 
But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you. 
Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more: Play games on Mashable 
What is Connections? 
The NYT 's latest daily word game has become a social media hit. 
The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications' Games section. 
Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common. 
Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. 
These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. 
Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. 
If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. 
Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake-players get up to four mistakes until the game ends. 
Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. 
Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. 
Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media. 
NYT Pips hints, answers for July 10, 2026 
Here's a hint for today's Connections categories 
Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? 
Then give these a try: 
Yellow: Fruit insides 
Green: Fruit-flavored 
Blue: Fun at college 
Meet The Mashable 101: Our list of the content creators shaping the internet today 
Here are today's Connections categories 
Need a little extra help? 
Today's connections fall into the following categories: 
Yellow: Reproductive Part of Fruit 
Green: Bit of Fruit-Flavored Candy 
Blue: Verbs in a College Life Slogan 
Purple: Starts of U.S. 
Capitals 
Looking for Wordle today? 
Here's the answer to today's Wordle. 
Ready for the answers? 
This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions. 
The solution to today's Connections #1127 is... 
What is the answer to Connections today 
Reproductive Part of Fruit: PIP, PIT, SEED, STONE 
Bit of Fruit-Flavored Candy: DOT, NERD, RUNT, SPREE 
Verbs in a College Life Slogan: PARTY, REPEAT, SLEEP, STUDY 
Starts of U.S. 
Capitals: DEN, MAD, PHO, SAC 
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for July 10, 2026 
Are you also playing NYT Strands? 
Get all the Strands hints you need for today's puzzle. 
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! 
Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more. 
Not the day you're after? 
Here's the solution to the latest Connections. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Mashable: 1.9%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 5.6%Mashable: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 2.4%Mashable: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Mashable: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias5.4%This article: 11.0%Mashable: 5.2%Framing Effect11.0%This article: 10.7%Mashable: 1.5%Loss Aversion10.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Mashable: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect4.0%This article: 6.9%Mashable: 4.2%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Mashable: 5.3%Negativity Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Mashable: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Mashable: 4.1%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Mashable: 1.1%Recency Bias8.7%This article: 2.5%Mashable: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.3%Mashable: 3.2%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 5.2%Mashable: 1.3%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 5.8%Mashable: 0.5%Slippery Slope5.8%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Mashable: 5.1%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.8%Mashable: 1.1%Bandwagon9.8%This article: 9.0%Mashable: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion9.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Mashable: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 10.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 7.2%Mashable: 2.5%Indoctrination7.2%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mashable: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 30.7%Mashable: 16.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…30.7%

553 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.