Ormund Hightower? 'House of the Dragon' Just Changed One Character From The Books For The Better 47%

By Dais Johnston61%

7/12/2026, 7:00:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Horn Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 513 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,601 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the article peer group.

HBO House of the Dragon has always been a show of loyalties. 
The “Team Green” and “Team Black” rivalry is always present in conversations around the series, even infiltrating the marketing campaigns. 
With no clear hero or villain, fans can root for whoever they like in the Dance of Dragons, but that same fact means that there’s no universal villain to root against. 
That is, until now. 
After more than 20 episodes, it seems like the series finally has a villain to rival Joffrey from Game of Thrones , and it’s the pomander-sniffing, Targaryen-hating, quick-tempered Ormund Hightower . 
He may be difficult to watch, but he’s the best addition to the show  and change from the book  so far. 
Season 3 Episode 4 of House of the Dragon reveals Ormund Hightower as a bit of a religious fanatic. 
| HBO Warning! 
Spoilers for House of the Dragon Season 3 Episode 4 ahead! 
In Fire & Blood , Ormund Hightower doesn’t have much of a personality. 
Instead, he acts as an agent for the Greens. 
But in the show, he’s got enough personality for all of Flea Bottom. 
From his first introduction, he’s come across as a posh snob out of touch with the common folk, put off by the odors of those he meets. 
But in Episode 4, we see just how far his ire goes. 
He’s not just a snob around those who aren’t Hightowers, he thinks that Hightowers are literally a superior kind of human. 
And this isn’t in a “they’re aliens” kind of way like Ser Raymun Fossoway says of Targaryens in A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms , he thinks anyone with silver hair is conspiring to ruin the world with evil spells. 
Ormund Hightower feels some big feelings when he learns Aemond won’t come to help him. 
| HBO And this anger isn’t restrained to just Targaryens. 
After receiving word that Aemond Targaryen won’t come to his aid, he gets visibly upset, prompting Daeron to whisper to an attendant to get out. 
Clearly, this is something that happens often enough for Daeron to recognize the early signs. 
Sure enough, Ormund absolutely explodes, drawing his sword and hacking away at the table. 
Ormund Hightower is clearly the new villain of House of the Dragon , a role that has been woefully absent since Aegon was burned in the Battle of Rook’s Rest. 
In fact, in the same episode where Ormund establishes himself as the show’s new villain, Aegon starts eating a little humble pie when he’s reduced to cleaning latrines, knowing that outing himself as the king is too dangerous. 
House of the Dragon may be more interesting with no clear hero or villain, but it’s a lot more fun to watch when there’s a guy who’s just the worst, and Ormund seems to be the worst by a long shot  and that’s simply the best. 
House of the Dragon Season 3 Episode 4 is now streaming on HBO Max. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 4.4%Inverse: 4.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 3.6%Inverse: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.0%Dais Johnston: 1.4%Inverse: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.5%Inverse: 2.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 3.6%Inverse: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Dais Johnston: 5.1%Inverse: 4.7%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.3%Inverse: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 5.9%Inverse: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.9%Inverse: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Dais Johnston: 6.5%Inverse: 8.7%Negativity Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Dais Johnston: 0.9%Inverse: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error9.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.8%In-Group Bias4.1%This article: 11.9%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 6.0%Inverse: 5.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 12.9%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.2%Horn Effect12.9%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.2%Inverse: 1.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 0.8%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.6%Inverse: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 4.6%Inverse: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.2%Inverse: 2.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.3%Inverse: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.5%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 32.0%Dais Johnston: 7.8%Inverse: 8.0%Hasty Generalization32.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.8%Dais Johnston: 5.3%Inverse: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.3%Inverse: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.8%Inverse: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.4%Inverse: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.7%Inverse: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.5%Inverse: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.0%Inverse: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.2%Inverse: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 2.0%Inverse: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 55.8%Dais Johnston: 20.4%Inverse: 21.3%Biased Writer Voice55.8%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 1.0%Inverse: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dais Johnston: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Dais Johnston: 3.3%Inverse: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.7%

513 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers10%attributed speech460writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageHBO • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageSer Raymun Fossoway • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHBO • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ser Raymun Fossoway

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words75% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice-62.2 ptsWriter: 62.2%Ser Raymun Fossoway: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Ser Raymun Fossoway: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.