Fox News89%

'DWTS' winner Robert Irwin was 'death rolled' by a 14-foot crocodile he named after Jimmy Fallon 35%

By Lori Bashian0%

5/10/2026, 7:15:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 857 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,387 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the article peer group.

Robert Irwin had a scary moment with a crocodile but lived to tell the tale. 
During a recent appearance on "The Tonight Show starring Jimmy Fallon," the 22-year-old conservationist shared he was "death rolled" by a 14-foot crocodile he named Jimmy Fallon when it was a baby. 
"He's not a baby anymore. 
I named this crocodile Jimmy Fallon, like, years ago, and he's now what we call a boss croc. 
He's huge," Robert said. 
"Because we research crocodiles in the wild to, like, better conserve them, right? 
So the way you do that  my dad came up with this  is you actually have to jump on them." 
The Australian conservationist told the talk show host that after he "jumped on the back of Jimmy Fallon," the large reptile "death rolled" him. 
BINDI IRWIN'S EMERGENCY SURGERY TOOK UNEXPECTED TURN FORCING HER TO MISS STEVE IRWIN GALA 
"I jumped onto him. 
I kid you not, 14 foot of crocodile, big croc, death rolls me," he explained. 
"So I'm stuck underneath him with my arm hanging out. 
I've got like probably, I don't know, maybe 700 pounds on top of me. 
And I'm just like, "What do I do?" 
And luckily he rolled back the other way, and I was fine. 
But he's a goer." 
Robert is the son of beloved reality TV star and environmentalist, Steve Irwin, also known as "The Crocodile Hunter," who was known for his work trying to teach the public to respect and protect all animals. 
Steve died in September 2006 after a stingray's tail pierced his chest and caused a fatal injury to his heart while filming a documentary on the Great Barrier Reef, when Robert was 2 years old. 
Since his death, his wife, Teri, and their two children, Robert and Bindi, who was 8 years old when Steve died, have taken over his mission towards advocating for all animals and running the Australian Zoo in Queensland. 
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER 
"To continue this legacy is the honour of my life," Robert shared on Instagram in October alongside a reel featuring footage of him and his father when he was younger, and of his father with animals. 
"If I can make my dad proud, I’ve done my job. 
Behind everything I do is a conservation mission that my dad started." 
Both Robert and his older sister Bindi competed on and won "Dancing with the Stars," with Bindi taking home the mirrorball trophy in 2015 during season 21 when she was 17 years old. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Robert took his turn in the ballroom in the fall of 2025, winning the show with his partner, Witney Carson. 
"Coming over from Australia, I didn't know how it would go. 
I didn’t think I'd make it this far, because I didn't realize how incredibly supportive America would be," he told Men's Health in December 2025. 
"It’s impossible to put into words how much that has meant to me, because what I represent is so much more than just a dance." 
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS 
When speaking with Men's Health, Robert also shared that he felt "grateful" to have been brought back week after week, because to him it meant that "what I stand for is being heard and that is incredible." 
"When I step into the ballroom, I'm representing a legacy that my dad [Steve Irwin] created with my mom. 
I'm representing everything I stand for, not only as a wildlife conservationist, but also as someone who is working really hard to try and spread some positivity and passion," he said. 
"I want to be a role model for young people." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Lori Bashian: 0.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Lori Bashian: 1.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Lori Bashian: 0.6%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias2.2%This article: 5.2%Lori Bashian: 5.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.5%Lori Bashian: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%Lori Bashian: 5.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Lori Bashian: 3.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias8.5%This article: 13.2%Lori Bashian: 7.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias13.2%This article: 6.0%Lori Bashian: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Lori Bashian: 1.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%Lori Bashian: 14.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect16.8%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Lori Bashian: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%Lori Bashian: 5.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Lori Bashian: 2.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.3%Lori Bashian: 6.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion1.3%This article: 1.7%Lori Bashian: 0.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 7.7%Lori Bashian: 5.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.9%Lori Bashian: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division1.9%This article: 6.3%Lori Bashian: 6.1%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal6.3%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.5%Lori Bashian: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 1.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.6%Lori Bashian: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lori Bashian: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Lori Bashian: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.4%

636 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker54%attributed speech290writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 5 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 37 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRobert Irwin • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robert Irwin

82%flagged-word coverage
346 attributed words100% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Robert Irwin: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Robert Irwin: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+2.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robert Irwin: 2.9%2.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.