MoDOT wants feedback on plans to close eastbound Interstate 64 in Midtown for a year 48%

By Will Bauer0%

4/29/2026, 2:07:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 777 faulty-reasoning hits from 608 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,467 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the article peer group.

Missouri’s Department of Transportation is planning to shut down the eastbound lanes of Interstate 64 in Midtown St. 
Louis for roughly a year starting in fall 2027  and the state agency is inviting commuters to weigh in at a public meeting Thursday evening. 
MoDOT is hosting the open house between 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. at the City Foundry. 
During the meeting, the agency’s engineers and planners will discuss preliminary plans to shut down about a mile of the interstate headed toward Illinois between Vandeventer and Compton avenues. 
“It’s a big deal,” said Jen Wade, MoDOT’s engineer for St. 
Louis. 
“There’s a lot of stuff going on, and it’s time to really start talking to the public about the details of this project in particular.” 
The maintenance required to upkeep the bridge that carries eastbound I-64 has increased over time, and it’s reached the point where investment to keep it going doesn’t make sense. 
Overall, the project will cost around $120 million, Wade said. 
While the eastbound lanes are completely closed, MoDOT will encourage drivers approaching from farther west to stay on Interstates 44 and 70. 
If they are closer to the closure, two lanes of traffic will exit I-64 at Vandeventer and use Forest Park Avenue to continue east. 
Other construction efforts in the project include: 
Updating the interchange around eastbound I-64 at Grand Boulevard. 
Rehabilitating the westbound I-64 bridge between Compton and Boyle avenues. 
Widening the Compton Avenue bridge over I-64 to better accommodate cyclists and pedestrians. 
Westbound I-64 will stay open and won’t be worked on until all eastbound lanes are complete in 2028. 
The whole project should be completed by late 2029, Wade said. 
Thursday evening’s meeting will not include a formal presentation. 
Rather, the public can show up anytime in the three-hour window to learn, ask questions and provide feedback. 
For anyone who can’t attend, MoDOT will post more information on its website after the meeting. 
“Tomorrow’s about making sure people start understanding what’s coming, and if we can get any detailed information back from the public about things we need to make sure we’re mitigating or answer questions about what we already have in place,” Wade said. 
The agency recently received pushback to its plans to revamp westbound ramps off I-64 at Grand and Compton. 
While it’s not ideal to adjust the engineering, MoDOT would rather know now and change accordingly, Wade said. 
The proposed construction effort comes from a recent study, called Future64, that aims to improve the interstate from Jefferson Avenue in the east to Kingshighway Boulevard in the west. 
This isn’t the first time MoDOT has shut down I-64. 
From January 2008 to December 2009, the state agency completely closed all lanes of the interstate in both directions for construction. 
Wade remembers concerned commuters referring to the late 2000s closure as “carmageddon.” 
This upcoming yearlong closure is different for a few reasons, she said. 
While there was, of course, additional congestion like there will be in 2027, the section closed is smaller, and it’s only closed in one direction, which will mean MoDOT will prioritize eastbound detour traffic to minimize slowdowns. 
Technology like Google Maps and Apple Maps also makes it easier to redirect drivers, and more people can work remotely now than in 2008, Wade said. 
“We have a lot of reasons to be confident that if we really think through this, if we do a great job communicating and if we put as many mitigations into place, that this can be a lower-impact experience for the St. 
Louis area,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Will Bauer: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Will Bauer: 2.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.9%This article: 11.7%Will Bauer: 4.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect11.7%This article: 3.6%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion3.6%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect4.8%This article: 14.8%Will Bauer: 8.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Will Bauer: 4.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias6.7%This article: 3.0%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%Will Bauer: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.9%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning6.9%This article: 4.3%Will Bauer: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.7%Will Bauer: 5.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion8.7%This article: 6.9%Will Bauer: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question6.9%This article: 10.4%Will Bauer: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.4%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Will Bauer: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.8%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 6.9%Will Bauer: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination6.9%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Bauer: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

608 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers66%attributed speech206writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJen Wade • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMoDOT • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 42 words • 0.0% coverageJen Wade • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jen Wade

84%flagged-word coverage
251 attributed words62% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination+16.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jen Wade: 16.7%16.7%Quote-first Misdirection+4.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jen Wade: 4.4%4.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.