MS NOW95%

Deadline: White House 59%

By MSNBC Staff0%

11/10/2025, 4:18:07 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 47.9% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 352 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,165 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the article peer group.

Deadline: White House is a news and opinion program that airs weekdays at 4 p.m. 
ET on MSNBC, hosted by Nicolle Wallace. 
The show provides in-depth analysis of the latest political developments, particularly focusing on the White House and national politics. 
Nicolle Wallace, a former White House communications director under President George W. 
Bush, brings her unique perspective to the program. 
With her background in Republican politics and extensive experience in media, Wallace offers balanced commentary on current events. 
The show features interviews with prominent political figures, journalists, and analysts, covering a wide range of topics from domestic policy to international affairs. 
Deadline: White House aims to cut through the noise of daily news cycles to provide viewers with clear insights into the stories that matter most. 
Viewers can watch full episodes, clips, and exclusive content on the MSNBC website and app. 
The program also has an active presence on social media, where fans can engage with the latest discussions and updates. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%MSNBC Staff: 2.7%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.6%MSNBC Staff: 17.0%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect37.6%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%MSNBC Staff: 3.8%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%MSNBC Staff: 13.5%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect16.4%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.8%MSNBC Staff: 12.1%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority15.8%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 12.1%MSNBC Staff: 6.1%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon12.1%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.2%MSNBC Staff: 3.8%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground15.2%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 42.4%MSNBC Staff: 33.6%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice42.4%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%MSNBC Staff: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 47.9%MSNBC Staff: 41.7%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…47.9%

165 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech131writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMSNBC • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageNicolle Wallace • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMSNBC • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

MSNBC

68%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words65% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +19.3 ptsWriter: 48.9%MSNBC: 68.2%68.2%Biased Writer Voice-53.4 ptsWriter: 53.4%MSNBC: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.