STLPR0%

Displaced Black church remembered and honored in Clayton ceremony 5%

By Chad Davis0%

4/20/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 471 faulty-reasoning hits from 561 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,871 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the article peer group.

Clayton is commemorating a Black Baptist church that was forced to move by city officials in the early 1960s. 
First Baptist Church of Clayton will be honored with a ceremony April 30. 
The church was located on South Brentwood Boulevard where the Park Tower condominiums now stand. 
City officials will install a historic marker near the site. 
The property was purchased by church leaders in 1894 for about $20, historian and retired Clayton teacher Donna Rogers-Beard said. 
The church was central to what was once a large Black population in the city. 
“Everything seems to have been done there, the funerals, the weddings, fundraisers, fish fries that involved seemingly the whole Clayton community,” Rogers-Beard said. 
At its peak, the church held baptisms attended by more than 1,000 people. 
Within two years, the congregation grew from 67 members to 600 members, and it had to build a new church on the same property, Rogers-Beard said. 
She credited the Rev. 
Willis Louis Rhodes, who joined in its early days, for helping to grow the church. 
In the mid-20th century, Clayton officials started urban renewal efforts and rezoned parts of the city to grow its commercial businesses. 
“Taxes go up, and many people who owned them could not afford the taxes,” Rogers-Beard said. 
“[Clayton] paid people really a little bit more than their property was worth, but meanwhile it decimates the Black community.” 
The church was part of the rezoned area and found its new home on Union Boulevard in the Wells-Goodfellow neighborhood where it has remained since and, there, was renamed Clayton Missionary Baptist Church. 
“I often wondered why a church in the city of St. 
Louis was named Clayton,” Pastor L. 
James Tate said. 
“When I learned the history of the church, and that it was once First Baptist of Clayton in the city of Clayton, Missouri, I began to do research on it and I learned a lot of things in regards to that.” 
Tate said most of the current congregants were either members of the original church or descendants of its original members. 
The church has remained on Union Boulevard since the 1960s but is in the process of moving to Clara Avenue. 
Tate said the recognition is a step forward and means a lot to the members. 
“The fact of the matter is, there are many people who are very, very emotional about this whole entire ceremony,” Tate said. 
“It’s almost [like] ‘we apologize and from this point on’ we're going to move forward. 
And they're happy about it.” 
The remembrance is the latest effort by Clayton officials to recognize its once-sprawling Black community through markers, monuments and ceremonies. 
In 2024, city leaders installed a marker on Carondelet Avenue in downtown Clayton dedicated to displaced residents. 
A plaque was also installed at the former Attucks School, the city's second school to teach Black children. 
Clayton leaders recently honored the Philippine community in the DeMun neighborhood that was displaced after the 1904 World's Fair. 
They will also remember the Osage Nation with a plaque at Oak Knoll Park later this year. 
“It's certainly just a part of just this need that we all felt to begin recognizing and just telling a fuller story of our past,” Mayor Clayton Bridget McAndrew said. 
“So it's just kind of one step in doing that.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 2.7%Chad Davis: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.6%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Chad Davis: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Chad Davis: 9.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias7.5%This article: 2.7%Chad Davis: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 2.7%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.4%Chad Davis: 9.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 5.3%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question5.3%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

561 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers50%attributed speech278writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Rogers-Beard • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Rogers-Beard • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Rogers-Beard • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Rogers-Beard • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Rogers-Beard • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 11 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 6 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 3 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 41 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 15 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 22 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 15 words • 0.0% coverageL. James Tate • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Clayton Bridget McAndrew • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Clayton Bridget McAndrew • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words14% of attributed speech32% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.