BBC0%

Euphoria Season 3 review: 'The show has lost its zeitgeisty edge' ★★☆☆☆ 67%

By Caryn James0%

4/8/2026, 3:57:02 PM

Topics: Features

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 850 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,222 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the article peer group.

Four years on, the provocative HBO drama is back, with Zendaya, Jacob Elordi and Sydney Sweeney all returning. 
Unfortunately, though, "it has become a series with very little to say". 
Of all the twists you might have anticipated for Euphoria's third and (rumoured) final season, turning Rue's (Zendaya) story into a neo-Western  driving across a desert, walking by an actual tumbleweed, working for a boss in a cowboy hat who carries a golden gun  was probably not high on anyone's list of guesses. 
That's just one of the many turns that may make you say: "Huh? 
Why?" 
When the show first appeared in 2019 it was provocative and zeitgeisty, notable for the matter-of-fact way it assumed that sex, drugs and gender fluidity in high school have become cultural norms. 
Since season 2 ended, four years ago, Zendaya, Jacob Elordi and Sydney Sweeney have become major film stars. 
And although all three return to their characters comfortably after this long delay, the show has lost its zeitgeisty edge. 
Euphoria has become a series with very little to say, none of it very audacious or compelling. 
Based on the three episodes, of eight, that HBO made available in advance, it is a strained attempt to make the closed circle of friends it follows, now in their early 20s, somehow the same only different. 
At times the show nods to old Western movies in its dialogue and gunplay, with a tone that is almost but not quite tongue-in-cheek 
It's easy to see why Zendaya has deservedly won two Emmys as Rue and her performance may be even more striking today because as her fame has grown we've become used to seeing the actress look polished and elegant in every public appearance, far from her rumpled, troubled character. 
Rue is still adrift, battling for sobriety in Mexico and working off her debt to Laurie (Martha Kelly), a drug dealer from the previous season. 
Zendaya makes Rue convincing even when navigating preposterous turns. 
She moves on to Texas and works for a man called Alamo (an amusingly sinister Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje) who owns a chain of low-rent strip clubs advertised as "fully nude, always lewd." 
A very efficient club manager, she hands out drugs to the strippers and keeps tabs on money. 
Zendaya is wry and credible delivering ludicrous lines like "And that's how I became a drug mule". 
At times the show nods to old Western movies in its dialogue and gunplay, with a tone that is almost but not quite tongue-in-cheek. 
Sam Levinson, the series creator, writer and director, has explained the influence, saying that when young adults are finding their way "it feels like the Wild West". 
He didn't have to take that so literally. 
The show struggles to make Rue's story different from before, yet Cassie (Sweeney) and Nate's (Elordi) trajectory is too much the same, wasting the opportunity that the time jump offers. 
They are engaged and living in a gaudy mansion. 
He is more duplicitous than ever, struggling after taking over his father's construction business, but his character is the most underdeveloped in this season so far. 
Cassie is even more spoiled and shallow than she was, insisting on spending $50,000 on flowers for their wedding. 
More like this: 
 10 of the best TV shows of 2026 so far 
 The genius of the Sopranos' most shocking episode 
 The true story behind a tragic US icon 
Her mind-boggling plan is to be both a tradwife and a sexy influencer, and she spends her days producing internet content. 
The season takes one stab at staying culturally relevant by tackling the way adult sites like OnlyFans are becoming mainstream. 
"It's not porn, it's erotica," Cassie tells Nate about her videos. 
But the theme is not unique. 
Elle Fanning's series Margot's Got Money Troubles, premiering a few days after Euphoria, handles it with more flair and thoughtfulness. 
Fans of the series may find that catching up with its familiar characters is satisfying enough. 
Lexi (Maude Apatow) is an assistant for a showrunner played by Sharon Stone, who pops up briefly in the first episode. 
So does Colman Domingo as Rue's AA sponsor Ali. 
Touchingly, Eric Dane, who died in February after being diagnosed with ALS, appears as Nate's disgraced father. 
Jules (Hunter Schafer), so central in previous seasons, went to art school and supports a luxurious life by sleeping with rich men. 
Her intense love affair with Rue is over but they cross paths again, so who knows? 
Wherever the next episodes go, the good news is that its many talented stars have much better things to do. 
★★☆☆☆ 
Euphoria Season 3 premieres in the US on 12 April on HBO Max, and in the UK on 13 April on NOW and Sky Atlantic. 
-- 
If you liked this story, sign up for The Essential List newsletter  a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news, delivered to your inbox twice a week. 
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Caryn James: 3.4%BBC: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.3%BBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Caryn James: 2.8%BBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 1.6%BBC: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.4%BBC: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Caryn James: 1.2%BBC: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias4.4%This article: 1.4%Caryn James: 5.2%BBC: 4.7%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.8%Caryn James: 0.5%BBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Caryn James: 1.2%BBC: 3.6%Optimism Bias1.9%This article: 11.8%Caryn James: 0.9%BBC: 0.9%Pessimism Bias11.8%This article: 26.6%Caryn James: 7.1%BBC: 4.4%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Caryn James: 0.7%BBC: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.3%BBC: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.5%BBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Caryn James: 12.4%BBC: 4.6%Halo Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 1.7%BBC: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Caryn James: 0.7%BBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%Caryn James: 6.4%BBC: 5.5%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 4.7%Caryn James: 1.1%BBC: 1.1%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.4%Caryn James: 4.9%BBC: 5.5%Hasty Generalization9.4%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 1.0%BBC: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.6%Caryn James: 3.1%BBC: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion3.6%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.8%BBC: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 1.4%BBC: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.3%BBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.6%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 1.4%BBC: 3.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Caryn James: 0.9%BBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Caryn James: 1.5%BBC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote1.4%This article: 1.4%Caryn James: 0.7%BBC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 12.9%Caryn James: 17.5%BBC: 5.8%Biased Writer Voice12.9%This article: 3.2%Caryn James: 0.5%BBC: 1.4%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caryn James: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Caryn James: 3.3%BBC: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.4%

850 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers7.1%attributed speech790writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageZendaya • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSam Levinson • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCassie • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageBBC • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sam Levinson

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words45% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sam Levinson: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%Sam Levinson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Sam Levinson: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Sam Levinson: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Sam Levinson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.