'Some will be appalled': The Drama's horrifying twist is set to divide audiences 76%

By Nicholas Barber0%

3/31/2026, 3:01:27 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.2% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 775 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.7% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,320 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the article peer group.

Zendaya and Robert Pattinson's new film about a soon-to-be married couple is a romcom with a disturbing difference. 
The result is 2026's "first great cinematic conversation-starter". 
Zendaya and Robert Pattinson haven't shied away from contentious material in the past, from Zendaya's breakthrough role in Euphoria to Pattinson's role in… well, pretty much everything he's done since the Twilight franchise. 
But their new film, The Drama, is sure to be the most divisive project to feature either of them. 
Some viewers will love it, and some will be appalled, despite it being, on one level, a romantic comedy about pre-wedding jitters. 
Warning: this article contains major spoilers for The Drama and references to violence which some readers may find distressing 
The best way to appreciate The Drama is not to know the details in advance, so don't read on if you want to see it as the film-makers intended. 
All that the trailers have given away is that Zendaya and Pattinson play a gorgeous young couple, Emma and Charlie, who are a week away from their wedding in Boston when Emma makes an alcohol-fuelled confession. 
After a few too many wines with their friends Rachel (Alana Haim) and Mike (Mamoudou Athie), Rachel talks them into revealing the worst things they've ever done. 
This article will reveal it, too, and while the scene is near the beginning of the film, it might be better not to know it at all  so be warned. 
Viewers will decide for themselves whether the backlash is justified, but the film's risk-taking is impressive, and its merits are undeniable 
Here it is: Emma says that when she was 15, she planned to take a rifle into her Louisiana high school and murder her classmates. 
She changed her mind, and no one ever guessed how close she came. 
But she knows what she wanted to do, and now Charlie knows it, too. 
Can he go ahead with the wedding? 
Can he take comfort in the fact that Emma committed no actual crime? 
Or should he run away from someone who may have lingering homicidal urges while he still can? 
The Drama isn't the first film to engage with high-school massacres: notable examples are Gus Van Sant's Elephant (2003) and Lynne Ramsay's We Need To Talk About Kevin (2011). 
The difference here is that Kristoffer Borgli, a Norwegian writer-director, puts the subject in a film which is fundamentally a comedy, the title notwithstanding. 
The Drama has a taboo-busting Scandinavian sensibility that recalls the provocative social satires of Ruben Östlund (Triangle of Sadness), Lukas Moodysson (Together), and Thomas Vinterberg (Another Round). 
But as that Scandi gallows humour has been applied to a film with a US setting and two glamorous blockbuster superstars, it's no surprise that there have already been media reports of a backlash against The Drama, even before its release. 
The father of one of the victims of the Columbine High School massacre told TMZ that the plot point was "awful". 
Viewers will decide for themselves whether the backlash is justified, but the film's risk-taking is a thrill, and it's beautifully made. 
Some scenes in isolation  especially those before the opening credits  are the stuff of a sparkling, aspirational romcom: Pattinson's character shares his first name, his messy fringe and his taste in eyewear with the hero of Four Weddings and a Funeral, and Pattinson himself has all the diffident English charm of a young Hugh Grant. 
Other scenes are the stuff of searing black comedy, and in these it's Haim who stands out, with her furious sarcasm and industrial-strength eye-rolls. 
Meanwhile, there are sensitive flashbacks that explore why the teenage Emma was drawn to murder, and these are reminiscent of Netflix's award-winning drama on a similar subject, Adolescence. 
The question is whether Borgli finds the perfect balance between these different tones. 
And the answer is: almost, but not quite. 
The Drama devotes more of its energies to awkward cringe comedy than to the reality of the characters and their feelings. 
It's ultimately a series of toe-curling, albeit hilarious sketches rather than a wholly convincing narrative, so it's more superficial than its traumatic scenario deserves. 
For one thing, it's hard to believe that Emma and Charlie would confine themselves to a few faltering chats about her confession, instead of having a proper conversation about it. 
Still, most people who see The Drama will end up having in-depth debates, even if the characters themselves don't manage it. 
The first great cinematic conversation-starter of 2026 is here. 
The Drama is released in US and UK cinemas on 3 April. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Nicholas Barber: 5.5%BBC: 3.0%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Nicholas Barber: 3.8%BBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic20.6%This article: 8.4%Nicholas Barber: 2.3%BBC: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 2.1%BBC: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Nicholas Barber: 2.0%BBC: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias10.1%This article: 9.0%Nicholas Barber: 6.6%BBC: 4.7%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.5%BBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Nicholas Barber: 2.6%BBC: 3.6%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 8.8%Nicholas Barber: 1.0%BBC: 0.9%Pessimism Bias8.8%This article: 32.5%Nicholas Barber: 8.0%BBC: 4.4%Negativity Bias32.5%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 1.3%BBC: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 1.9%BBC: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.4%BBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Nicholas Barber: 7.1%BBC: 4.6%Halo Effect22.2%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.6%BBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 2.3%BBC: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.5%BBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 1.1%BBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.4%Nicholas Barber: 5.6%BBC: 5.5%Appeal to Authority21.4%This article: 5.0%Nicholas Barber: 1.6%BBC: 1.1%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Nicholas Barber: 7.9%BBC: 5.5%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.7%Nicholas Barber: 1.3%BBC: 0.7%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 27.7%Nicholas Barber: 3.8%BBC: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion27.7%This article: 3.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.5%Begging the Question3.7%This article: 5.3%Nicholas Barber: 3.7%BBC: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.6%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.4%BBC: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.7%Nicholas Barber: 2.7%BBC: 3.5%Anecdotal2.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.0%Nicholas Barber: 1.4%BBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.0%BBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Middle Ground1.7%This article: 3.9%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity3.9%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.2%BBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.3%BBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Nicholas Barber: 1.1%BBC: 1.2%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 4.9%Nicholas Barber: 0.9%BBC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 46.2%Nicholas Barber: 11.0%BBC: 5.8%Biased Writer Voice46.2%This article: 7.7%Nicholas Barber: 0.7%BBC: 1.4%Indoctrination7.7%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicholas Barber: 0.1%BBC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Nicholas Barber: 3.0%BBC: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

775 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.