'Horrible' audio of Athena Strand, 7, being murdered will be played in court despite FedEx driver filmed abducting her pleading guilty to murder, as his icy final warning to her is revealed 57%

By Natasha Anderson0%

4/8/2026, 12:30:58 PM

Topics: Texas

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 655 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (8,897 of 20,445 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the article peer group.

Hellish audio of a seven-year-old girl being strangled to death by a FedEx driver filmed abducting her will still be played to jurors despite him admitting her murder. 
Athena Strand's final moments at the hands of Tanner Horner, 34, was captured by a microphone after he covered a camera on his truck following the November 2022 abduction in Fort Worth, Texas. 
Horner pleaded guilty to capital murder on Tuesday, just before his trial was due to begin, with a nightmarish dash camera photo of Athena being driven to her death subsequently shown to the court. 
Jurors have been warned by Wise County prosecutors that they will still be presented with all the evidence in the case for the 'punishment phase' of the trial, which will see them decide whether Horner should be sentenced to death. 
Wise County District Attorney James Stainton said: 'You are going to hear what a 250-pound man can do to a 67-pound child. 
'And when I say it's horrible, I mean it.' 
Jurors will be watching video and listening to audio files during Wednesday's hearing, with Horner said to have warned Strand: 'Don't scream or I'll hurt you' as he picked her up and put her in his truck. 
'The first thing Tanner Horner says to Athena when he picks her up and puts her in that truck, he leans down and he says: "Don't scream or I'll hurt you." 
He says that twice,' Stainton told the jury. 
The prosecutor said Strand fought Horner, and his DNA was found under her fingernails. 
He also said Horner's DNA was found 'in places where you shouldn't find DNA on a 7-year-old girl.' 
'The only truthful thing that Tanner Horner told law enforcement was that he killed her,' the prosecutor added. 
'The pattern and web of lies that he put together, it's going to be hard for y'all to keep up with. 
It is lie upon lie upon lie upon lie.' 
Strand was snatched from her home by Horner after he delivered a box of Barbies that was to form part of her Christmas present in what appears to be a crime of opportunity. 
Horner claimed he'd accidentally struck Strand with his truck and injured her, before strangling her and driving away with her body in a panic. 
But the photo taken from inside the truck shared with jurors showed the little girl very much alive, with DA Stainton branding Horner's excuse 'a web of lies.' 
Strand's body was driven seven miles away from her home by Horner, where it was dumped and found hours later. 
Stainton told jurors that Strand was uninjured when Horner put her into the vehicle. 
Strand's mother, Maitlyn Gandy, has vehemently supported the death penalty for her daughter's killer. 
She released a statement after Horner was indicted stating that 'every breath he takes is one my daughter doesn't.' 
But Horner's attorney Steven Goble asked jurors to sentence him to life in prison. 
In his opening statements, Goble pointed to Horner's physical ailments and mental illnesses. 
While acknowledging that the evidence against Horner was 'overwhelming' and 'terrible,' he told jurors that Horner's mother drank while she was pregnant, that he has autism and suffered from 'various mental illnesses throughout his life.' 
'When someone's brain is what's injured, you don't see it,' Goble said. 
Horner was also exposed to a 'massive amount of lead' during his developmental years, he said, citing how the killer had 24 times the normal amount of lead in his bones. 
'You don't have to be a scientist or doctor to know that lead has terrible effects on the brain,' Goble added. 
Horner's trial resumes today at 9am local time (10am EST) with jurors expected to watch hours of footage, including Horner's interviews with police. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.0%Natasha Anderson: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Natasha Anderson: 2.8%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 2.7%Natasha Anderson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.7%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Natasha Anderson: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias3.2%This article: 14.4%Natasha Anderson: 7.2%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect14.4%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Natasha Anderson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 2.5%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Natasha Anderson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias1.4%This article: 43.5%Natasha Anderson: 13.6%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias43.5%This article: 5.3%Natasha Anderson: 2.5%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 5.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 2.2%Daily Mail: 4.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Natasha Anderson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect3.2%This article: 1.2%Natasha Anderson: 0.7%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias1.2%This article: 6.7%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Natasha Anderson: 1.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem7.5%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Natasha Anderson: 3.2%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 4.9%Natasha Anderson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.2%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Natasha Anderson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 33.0%Natasha Anderson: 9.6%Daily Mail: 7.5%Appeal to Emotion33.0%This article: 2.7%Natasha Anderson: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 4.7%Natasha Anderson: 2.8%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.7%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.1%Natasha Anderson: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Burden of Proof6.1%This article: 1.8%Natasha Anderson: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature1.8%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 1.1%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.0%Natasha Anderson: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.3%Natasha Anderson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading5.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Natasha Anderson: 1.1%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 4.9%Natasha Anderson: 2.1%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 14.4%Natasha Anderson: 9.0%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice14.4%This article: 3.2%Natasha Anderson: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Anderson: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

655 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers41%attributed speech386writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWise County prosecutors • 40 words • 0.0% coverageJames Stainton • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJames Stainton • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageJames Stainton • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJames Stainton • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJames Stainton • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMaitlyn Gandy • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 35 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 12 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 31 words • 0.0% coverageSteven Goble • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steven Goble

100%flagged-word coverage
126 attributed words47% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.4 ptsWriter: 24.4%Steven Goble: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+16.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steven Goble: 16.7%16.7%Unattributed Quote-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Steven Goble: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Steven Goble: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.