Ex-L.A. County sheriff's deputy gets prison time for using search warrant for a private client 4%

By Brittny Mejia62%

7/20/2026, 3:57:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 309 faulty-reasoning hits from 679 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,095 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the article peer group.

A former Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department deputy was sentenced Monday to a year in prison for submitting a false search warrant application to obtain information on a private client's estranged husband during her contentious divorce proceedings. 
David Anthony Rodriguez, 45, of La Verne, pleaded guilty in July 2025 to a count of conspiracy against rights. 
He left the Sheriff's Department in October. 
In a search warrant application to a state court judge, Rodriguez lied that he needed GPS tracking information on a robbery suspect's cellphone when it was really to monitor a private client’s estranged husband during contentious divorce proceedings, according to the U.S. attorney's office in L.A. 
Rodriguez is among a handful of current and former deputies who have been charged related to their work for private clients  primarily for Adam Iza, a cryptocurrency businessman known as "The Godfather." 
Iza, who has been in federal custody since September 2024, has pleaded guilty to a slew of charges in California and Connecticut and awaits sentencing. 
In a statement, the department said the “criminal actions outlined in this case are unacceptable and inconsistent” with its “high standards and expectations.” 
“The overwhelming majority of our employees serve our communities with integrity, professionalism, and distinction every day, and they deserve to work alongside individuals who uphold those same standards,” the statement read. 
While working as a deputy, Rodriguez began working for a private security company owned by a colleague, Eric Chase Saavedra, around 2021, according to his plea agreement. 
Through the company, Rodriguez began working at least twice a month as a security guard for a wealthy L.A.-based woman who had an ongoing dispute with her husband. 
Rodriguez received cash payments in exchange for his shifts. 
Through his employment, according to the plea agreement, Rodriguez learned that his client was concerned for her safety and believed her husband  identified only by his initials T.F.  possessed valuable goods that she said belonged to her. 
After learning that his client couldn't locate her husband, Rodriguez admitted to obtaining a warrant in July 2022 under false pretenses in order to find him. 
In an affidavit, Rodriguez falsely said that a detective contacted him and asked for help from the department’s gang surveillance team in connection with a robbery that occurred three days prior in Cudahy, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in L.A. 
Rodriguez falsely indicated that the victim’s cellphone number was associated with the robbery suspect. 
After serving the search warrant on the phone provider, Rodriguez obtained GPS location pings associated with T.F.’s cellphone that showed he was in Utah. 
Rodriguez admitted in his plea agreement to sharing that information with Saavedra and later learning that Sheriff’s Department deputies towed the victim’s vehicle while he was in Los Angeles and that co-conspirators placed a tracking device on the victim’s vehicle in Utah and sent a threatening text message to him. 
“This was not impulsive conduct or a momentary lapse in judgment,” prosecutors said in a sentencing memo. 
“It was a calculated abuse of authority carried out with full awareness of its significance.” 
As part of his employment, Rodriguez also worked as a security guard for Iza, 25, who resided in Beverly Hills and Newport Beach. 
Among those charged related to their work for Iza are Saavedra, Scott Simkins, Christopher Michael Cadman and Michael David Coberg. 
This month, a federal judge sentenced Simkins to a year and a half in prison for obstructing the investigation into Iza by lying that he never witnessed him threaten and extort $25,000 from a party planner at his Bel Air mansion. 
Coberg is serving a more than five-year prison term for conspiring with Iza to extort and falsely arrest rivals. 
Cadman pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy against rights and attesting to a false tax return and is awaiting sentencing. 
Saavedra pleaded guilty in February 2025 to conspiracy against rights and making and attesting to a false tax return. 
He is set to be sentenced in the coming months. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Brittny Mejia: 3.0%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 9.3%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Brittny Mejia: 11.5%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Brittny Mejia: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Brittny Mejia: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Brittny Mejia: 4.8%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 9.5%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Brittny Mejia: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Brittny Mejia: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.5%Brittny Mejia: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote10.5%This article: 2.2%Brittny Mejia: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 4.4%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 3.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 3.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brittny Mejia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

679 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers25%attributed speech506writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. attorney's office in L.A. • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coveragethe department • 23 words • 100.0% coveragethe department • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. attorney’s office in L.A. • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageprosecutors • 17 words • 100.0% coverageprosecutors • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

the department

100%flagged-word coverage
54 attributed words31% of attributed speech24% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%the department: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.