Does Nithya Raman still have a chance? California's uncounted votes could help Democrats 33%

By Grace Toohey0%

6/3/2026, 7:41:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 855 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.5% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,265 of 21,171 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the article peer group.

With many races still very tight and millions of ballots yet to be counted, political experts said Democrats are likely to hold  or even gain  the edge as results of the primary election come into focus. 
Republicans appear to have over-performed in early vote counts, but for a variety of reasons, experts believe the ballots will lean more Democratic as the latest vote-by-mail ballots are counted. 
This could benefit progressives in close races, but by how much remains an open question. 
“Don’t count [Councilmember] Nithya Raman out yet,” said Zev Yaroslavsky, director of the Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin, who closely tracks local elections. 
Raman is currently in third place behind reality TV personality Spencer Pratt and Mayor Karen Bass, who has secured a spot in the runoff. 
Raman would have to make up significant ground to reach Pratt and receive a sizable portion of remaining votes. 
“Pratt has an edge ... but it’s not free from doubt at this point,” Yaroslavsky said. 
Rob Stutzman, a longtime GOP strategist, agrees the remaining vote count will skew more strongly for Democrats, but he’s “not so sure it’s going to change where we’re at.” 
“I don’t think you’re going to see a big swing,” Stutzman said. 
Raman’s chances rely on her beating Bass considerably in the remaining count  “that doesn’t seem very likely,” Stutzman said. 
Still, the GOP  long the minority in deep blue California  had things to brag about on election night. 
Pratt, a Republican, clearly broke through to a certain segment of Los Angeles, which is overwhelmingly Democratic. 
And Steve Hilton, a Fox News commentator backed by President Trump, emerged as the leading vote-getter in the race to replace Gov. 
Gavin Newsom. 
Experts have said both tapped into dissatisfaction with the status quo in Democratic politics. 
But in recent years, early momentum from Republicans has been tempered as the vote count becomes more complete, especially as Democrats are generally more comfortable voting by mail, a process that drags out election results. 
And this primary, a push from the Democratic Party to have voters cast later ballots increases the possibility of a blue swing. 
Yaroslavsky predicted that ballots are going to get “more democratic, more progressive,” particularly in Los Angeles County. 
“The Republicans over-performed,” Yaroslavsky said of early vote tallies. 
This phenomenon was particularly evident last primary, when Bass initially trailed developer Rick Caruso in the mayoral race, but as more ballots came in, Bass continued to gain a lead. 
As of Wednesday morning, a higher share  32%  of counted ballots came from registered Republicans across the state, compared with 29% during 2022’s primary at this point in the count, according to election tracking firm Political Data Inc. 
And Democrats have made up a smaller share of early vote counts this primary  47% thus far compared with 51% in 2022  which include early mailed-in and dropped-off ballots and votes cast at in-person polls. 
The top two vote-getters advance to the November election, regardless of party. 
That blue swing could also affect some statewide contests, experts said, particularly in the close race for governor. 
The top three vote-getters as of Wednesday morning  Hilton and Democrats Xavier Becerra and Tom Steyer  were all within a few percentage points, though less than 60% of the expected vote had been counted. 
Could Hilton  currently with about 28% of counted votes  face a real challenge from Steyer for the second place spot? 
It would be tough, experts say. 
“I think he’s fairly comfortable,” Stutzman said of Hilton. 
Unless voter turnout is markedly higher than expected, he doesn’t see an easy path for Steyer coming back, especially because it would require Steyer resoundingly beating Becerra in the late vote. 
Hilton currently leads the contest by about 100,000 votes over Becerra, but has an edge of about 400,000 votes over Steyer. 
Pollsters expect Becerra to make the runoff, given California’s strong blue slant and recent surveys. 
Ballots in California are accepted for up to seven days after the election if they are postmarked on or before election day, and the official count can take up to 30 days. 
Voting by mail (or drop box) has become the favorite method among Californians since universal vote-by-mail was implemented in 2021: more than 80% of ballots have since come from absentee, or vote-by-mail ballots, according to the California Voter Foundation’s analysis of the last four vote counts in California. 
In 2022’s primary it was as high as 91%. 
“We need to accept the first ballots that are counted aren’t always those that are most representative,” said Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University. 
But that’s not a sign that elections are rigged or fraudulent, she said, despite some politicians peddling such falsehoods. 
“We allow people lots of different avenues to vote, and as a result it takes longer to count up all the votes,” Levinson said. 
“That’s how it should be. ... 
It’s an argument in favor of making sure the process runs correctly  not quickly.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Grace Toohey: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Grace Toohey: 4.5%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic9.9%This article: 5.8%Grace Toohey: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Grace Toohey: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.1%This article: 5.4%Grace Toohey: 4.8%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.5%Grace Toohey: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Grace Toohey: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 3.6%Grace Toohey: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 4.6%Grace Toohey: 10.4%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias4.6%This article: 2.3%Grace Toohey: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Grace Toohey: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Grace Toohey: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Grace Toohey: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.7%Grace Toohey: 4.7%Daily Pilot: 5.0%Appeal to Authority31.7%This article: 8.5%Grace Toohey: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%Grace Toohey: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 6.1%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.4%Grace Toohey: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.4%This article: 2.2%Grace Toohey: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque2.2%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.7%Grace Toohey: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.7%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Grace Toohey: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground1.8%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.6%Grace Toohey: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy2.6%This article: 12.4%Grace Toohey: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote12.4%This article: 2.8%Grace Toohey: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 0.7%Grace Toohey: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.7%This article: 1.8%Grace Toohey: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination1.8%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Grace Toohey: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Grace Toohey: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

855 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers30%attributed speech597writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageZev Yaroslavsky • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageZev Yaroslavsky • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRob Stutzman • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRob Stutzman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRob Stutzman • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageZev Yaroslavsky • 17 words • 0.0% coverageZev Yaroslavsky • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageRob Stutzman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRob Stutzman • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Levinson • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Levinson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Levinson • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Levinson • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJessica Levinson • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zev Yaroslavsky

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words26% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+36.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zev Yaroslavsky: 36.4%36.4%Unattributed Quote-17.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%Zev Yaroslavsky: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Zev Yaroslavsky: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Zev Yaroslavsky: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.