Here's where and when it's expected to rain in Southern California this week 2%

By Alex Wigglesworth0%

4/27/2026, 7:25:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 299 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,561 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the article peer group.

More rain could be in store for Los Angeles this week. 
Skies will be partly cloudy Tuesday, with temperatures warming to the low to mid-70s, said Ryan Kittell, meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Oxnard. 
But by Wednesday night, most parts of Los Angeles have a roughly 20% to 30% chance of getting a measurable amount of rain, he said. 
There's also a slight chance of showers over the eastern San Gabriel Mountains on Thursday morning and afternoon, according to the forecast. 
Winds are expected to pick up late Wednesday into Thursday, especially in mountain and desert areas, with gusts in the 25- to 35-mph range, Kittell said. 
No impacts are expected as far as flooding or downed trees, he said. 
Many areas will probably remain dry, and those that do receive rain will see less than a quarter of an inch, Kittell said. 
The chance of rain increases farther south, in Orange and San Diego counties, he said. 
Forecasters are then predicting a warming trend, with high temperatures in most places expected to be in the mid-70s to upper 80s on Friday and Saturday. 
There's an additional chance of very light rain early next week, probably on Monday, Kittell said. 
These storms may represent the last gasp of Southern California's rainy season, which typically ends in April. 
So far, downtown L.A. has received roughly 18.98 inches of rain since Oct. 1, the start of the water year. 
That's more than the 13.65 inches that is normal at this point in the year. 
Still, California is enduring its second-worst snow drought in 50 years, which experts say is a sign of how rising temperatures from climate change are worsening the West's long-term water supply problems. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias10.7%This article: 5.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias5.0%This article: 10.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 5.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 5.4%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 10.1%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 45.8%Alex Wigglesworth: 4.5%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority45.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 3.7%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.7%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Wigglesworth: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

299 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker48%attributed speech156writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Kittell • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ryan Kittell

73%flagged-word coverage
143 attributed words100% of attributed speech41% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.