The worst heat wave to hit Southern California in March is finally coming to an end 2%

By Summer Lin59%

3/20/2026, 2:18:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 369 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (21,509 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the article peer group.

A scorching heat wave that broke temperature records across Southern California this week is expected to end. 
It’s finally expected to cool down in Southern California this weekend after a scorching heat wave this week broke temperature records across the region. 
Temperatures are expected to drop on Saturday into the upper 70s and low 80s along the coast and the low 90s inland and in the valleys, according to the National Weather Service. 
On Thursday, it was 102 degrees in Woodland Hills, surpassing the 96-degree record high temperature for Mar. 19 set in 1997, according to the weather service. 
It was 93 degrees in Lancaster Thursday, surpassing the 87-degree record set in 2004. 
Records were also broken in Palmdale, Long Beach Airport, UCLA, Camarillo, Oxnard, Santa Maria and Paso Robles. 
But looking forward, temperatures are expected to cool down a few more degrees on Sunday and warm up a bit Monday into next week, according to the weather service. 
Temperatures are forecast to be in the mid-80s along the coast and low to mid-90s everywhere else most of next week. 
“We broke so many records,” said National Weather Service meteorologist Bryan Lewis. 
“It’s not normal for this kind of year to have this kind of heat, where it’s 20 to 30 degrees above normal. 
It’ll remain hot next week too.” 
Heat advisories are expected to expire by Friday night but there’s a chance of more advisories next week. 
Friday is the last day of the significant heat wave, with temperatures in the 90s and low triple digits in the inland valley areas, according to Lewis. 
It‘s expected to be in the mid-70s and in the 80s along the coast on Friday. 
Heat exhaustion and dehydration could result from the heat wave, especially during this time of year, when the temperatures are normally around 70 degrees, according to Lewis. 
“We do see these temperatures in the summertime,” Lewis said. 
“It catches people and our bodies off guard. 
The coastal areas don’t have AC so that could also cause some issues there. 
Strenuous activities during the heat can cause some of those issues as well.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Summer Lin: 7.6%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Summer Lin: 5.7%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Summer Lin: 11.4%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 3.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 10.2%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.5%Summer Lin: 7.0%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Summer Lin: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

369 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers80%attributed speech75writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 32 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 14 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 14 words • 0.0% coverageBryan Lewis • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bryan Lewis

32%flagged-word coverage
155 attributed words53% of attributed speech53% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.