California's new EV incentive gives a leg up to Lucid and Rivian 24%

By Lloyd Lee33%

7/13/2026, 11:27:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 569 faulty-reasoning hits from 542 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,813 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the article peer group.

Companies like Rivan and Lucid could be exempt from the price caps that bar EVs from qualifying for California's new incentive program. 
Patrick T. 
Fallon/AFP via Getty Images 
CA Gov. 
Gavin Newsom signed a new bill that gives first-time EV buyers a $3,500 rebate. 
The bill limits the incentive to new EVs priced at $50,000 or less. 
The bill exempts California-based companies, such as Rivian and Lucid, from the price cap. 
California is launching a new incentive program for first-time electric vehicle buyers that gives companies like Rivian and Lucid an edge. 
Gov. 
Gavin Newsom signed a bill, SB 168, into law on Monday that will give first-time EV customers an instant incentive of $3,500 on a new vehicle and $1,750 toward a used one at the point of sale. 
The program, called MyFirstEV, is expected to launch this summer, though the state did not announce an exact start date. 
A spokesperson for the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which will administer the statewide program, told Business Insider that the agency expects to announce participating automakers next month. 
The bill has a price cap for EVs to qualify. 
New vehicles can't have a manufacturer's suggested retail price above $50,000, while used vehicles can't sell for more than $25,000. 
However, the law exempts EV makers headquartered in California that manufacture only zero-emission vehicles, allowing companies like Rivian and Lucid to participate in the incentive program regardless of vehicle prices. 
Rivian is headquartered in Irvine, while Lucid is based in Newark. 
Both companies sell vehicles priced well above the bill's caps. 
Rivian's R1T truck has a starting price of under $80,000. 
Lucid primarily sells luxury EVs, with the Air sedan starting at around $71,000. 
A Lucid spokesperson told Business Insider that it intends to participate in the statewide program and that Lucid Air and Gravity vehicles will be eligible for California customers. 
"We see this as a meaningful opportunity to help make advanced electric vehicles more accessible to California buyers," the spokesperson said, adding that the company "applauds the inclusion of the exemption." 
Although Tesla manufactures the Model 3 and Model Y at its Fremont factory and maintains an engineering headquarters in Palo Alto, it would be excluded from the exemption. 
The company moved its corporate headquarters from California to Austin in 2021. 
The CARB spokesperson confirmed that Lucid and Rivian could qualify for the exemption, while Tesla would be subject to the price caps. 
Tesla wouldn't be entirely shut out of the incentive program. 
Lower-priced versions of the Model 3 and Model Y that fall below the $50,000 cap could qualify if the company chooses to participate. 
The CA governor's office presented the program as a replacement for the federal EV tax credit program, which the Trump administration rolled back. 
Under the now-defunct federal program, EV buyers could get up to $7,500 in incentives. 
"Donald Trump is doing everything in his power to pollute our air and surrender the clean car industry to China on a silver platter. 
California is putting its foot on the accelerator," Newsom said in a statement. 
Spokespeople for Rivian and Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. 
Read the original article on Business Insider 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.8%Lloyd Lee: 3.1%Business Insider: 2.5%Confirmation Bias14.8%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Lloyd Lee: 1.0%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 1.8%Lloyd Lee: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.6%Business Insider: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Lloyd Lee: 8.4%Business Insider: 5.0%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Lloyd Lee: 1.4%Business Insider: 3.1%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.3%Business Insider: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Lloyd Lee: 4.0%Business Insider: 4.6%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 5.7%Lloyd Lee: 4.6%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 2.1%Business Insider: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.9%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.5%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 6.5%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Lloyd Lee: 2.5%Business Insider: 3.3%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.7%Business Insider: 4.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.5%Lloyd Lee: 7.1%Business Insider: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion12.5%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.3%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.2%Lloyd Lee: 1.0%Business Insider: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.8%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.3%Business Insider: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Lloyd Lee: 2.1%Business Insider: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.2%Lloyd Lee: 1.4%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading4.2%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 2.4%Business Insider: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.1%Lloyd Lee: 3.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection10.1%This article: 6.1%Lloyd Lee: 1.9%Business Insider: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice6.1%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 0.3%Business Insider: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lloyd Lee: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Lloyd Lee: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.2%This article: 1.3%Lloyd Lee: 0.9%Business Insider: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

542 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers36%attributed speech345writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Air Resources Board (CARB) • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLucid • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLucid • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Air Resources Board (CARB) • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 24 words • 100.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lucid

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words30% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Quote-first Misdirection+52.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lucid: 52.5%52.5%Biased Writer Voice-9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Lucid: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Lucid: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Lucid: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.