Between Iran and a hard place - Blogs 91%

By Eric Utter95%

7/10/2026, 9:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Burden of Proof, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 77.2% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 1,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 333 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,125 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

There is something going on, a dynamic in place, that I've not seen remarked upon previously: Iran does not need to play the tough guy and refuse to make concessions to the U.S. because it will never abide by them, anyway . 
There is no agreement or "Memorandum of Understanding" that it will not thumb its nose at, no vow it will not break. 
Therefore, the only reason they are doing so is to make President Trump look weak and foolish and embarrass America. 
And we are allowing them to do this, which makes us look weaker and more foolish. 
Day after day, week after week - and now month after month - we are allowing them to play this game ... as Iran's leaders, such as they may be, sneer and laugh. 
As I have previously written , all Iran and its crazy mullahs and IRGC thugocracy have to do to claim victory is survive. 
President Trump, the master of "The Art of the Deal," is used to negotiating with people who are sane and have vested interests in seeking a win-win solution/agreement, so he may have come late to an acknowledgment of Iran's utter and complete perfidy. 
And yet others, too, still appear credulous. 
"Sure, Iran's leaders may give 74 lashes to girls who appear in public with their head exposed , throw gays off rooftops, and slaughter thousands of their own citizens for protesting, but do you really think they'd mislead us or lie about an agreement or "Memorandum of Understanding?" 
I am not alt-right, I am not woke right. 
I am MAGA all the way, through-and-through. 
Proudly. 
But Trump will have to pull the proverbial rabbit out of the proverbial hat to save face as regards Iran at this point. 
Much as I admire him, Trump does not readily admit to mistakes. 
Let's hope and pray that he can rectify this one. 
Image: Library of Congress, via Picryl // public domain 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.2%Eric Utter: 13.1%American Thinker: 10.6%Confirmation Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 6.3%American Thinker: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.5%American Thinker: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.4%American Thinker: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 3.3%American Thinker: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 2.0%American Thinker: 7.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Eric Utter: 0.5%American Thinker: 1.6%Optimism Bias3.0%This article: 19.5%Eric Utter: 5.1%American Thinker: 2.6%Pessimism Bias19.5%This article: 77.2%Eric Utter: 23.1%American Thinker: 13.0%Negativity Bias77.2%This article: 6.3%Eric Utter: 2.4%American Thinker: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias6.3%This article: 6.0%Eric Utter: 4.8%American Thinker: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 1.1%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Eric Utter: 7.9%American Thinker: 3.9%In-Group Bias11.7%This article: 12.9%Eric Utter: 11.2%American Thinker: 5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias12.9%This article: 12.9%Eric Utter: 3.3%American Thinker: 2.6%Halo Effect12.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 1.8%American Thinker: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%Eric Utter: 2.0%American Thinker: 1.3%Recency Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Eric Utter: 8.8%American Thinker: 5.6%Ad Hominem9.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 5.7%American Thinker: 4.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.9%Eric Utter: 5.1%American Thinker: 4.7%Appeal to Authority12.9%This article: 39.9%Eric Utter: 9.5%American Thinker: 4.7%False Dilemma39.9%This article: 14.4%Eric Utter: 8.7%American Thinker: 3.3%Slippery Slope14.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.1%Eric Utter: 20.4%American Thinker: 16.8%Hasty Generalization20.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.2%Eric Utter: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon4.2%This article: 32.4%Eric Utter: 20.7%American Thinker: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion32.4%This article: 6.0%Eric Utter: 1.7%American Thinker: 2.7%Begging the Question6.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 1.2%American Thinker: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 2.5%American Thinker: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 53.5%Eric Utter: 8.2%American Thinker: 1.7%Burden of Proof53.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.8%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 2.7%American Thinker: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 6.9%Eric Utter: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.4%No True Scotsman6.9%This article: 12.6%Eric Utter: 2.1%American Thinker: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 14.4%Eric Utter: 2.2%American Thinker: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy14.4%This article: 14.4%Eric Utter: 3.2%American Thinker: 3.1%Unattributed Quote14.4%This article: 27.3%Eric Utter: 5.2%American Thinker: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection27.3%This article: 65.8%Eric Utter: 35.7%American Thinker: 22.9%Biased Writer Voice65.8%This article: 22.5%Eric Utter: 13.0%American Thinker: 5.9%Indoctrination22.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 31.5%Eric Utter: 26.4%American Thinker: 14.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias31.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Utter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

333 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker13%attributed speech290writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Trump • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

President Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words100% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+83.4 ptsWriter: 16.6%President Trump: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +78.6 ptsWriter: 21.4%President Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+39.3 ptsWriter: 60.7%President Trump: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-25.9 ptsWriter: 25.9%President Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-16.6 ptsWriter: 16.6%President Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.